> On 16 Jan 2019, at 05:05, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 06:14:14PM -0800, Mason Green wrote:
>> Solomonoff’s method of induction seems like a good fit for a mechanist view
>> of things. For instance, it could be used to assign a relative probability
>> to the universe
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 06:14:14PM -0800, Mason Green wrote:
> Solomonoff’s method of induction seems like a good fit for a mechanist view
> of things. For instance, it could be used to assign a relative probability to
> the universe being generated by a universal dovetailer: 2^(-K) * m, where K
> On 12 Jan 2019, at 03:14, Mason Green wrote:
>
> Solomonoff’s method of induction seems like a good fit for a mechanist view
> of things. For instance, it could be used to assign a relative probability to
> the universe being generated by a universal dovetailer: 2^(-K) * m, where K
> is th
On 1/12/2019 3:12 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:14:14 PM UTC-6, Mason Green wrote:
Solomonoff’s method of induction seems like a good fit for a
mechanist view of things. For instance, it could be used to assign
a relative probability to the universe be
On Friday, January 11, 2019 at 8:14:14 PM UTC-6, Mason Green wrote:
>
> Solomonoff’s method of induction seems like a good fit for a mechanist
> view of things. For instance, it could be used to assign a relative
> probability to the universe being generated by a universal dovetailer:
> 2^(-K)
Solomonoff’s method of induction seems like a good fit for a mechanist view of
things. For instance, it could be used to assign a relative probability to the
universe being generated by a universal dovetailer: 2^(-K) * m, where K is the
Kolmogorov complexity of the universal dovetailer and m is
6 matches
Mail list logo
