>
> Fritz Griffith, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, asks about the Doomsday
> argument. I suggest looking at http://www.anthropic-principle.com/,
> a whole web site on this topic, by Nick Bostrom. We have had some
> discussion here, and I think the result was that in an all-universe model
> the argument l
How would you verify your Life pattern has achieved SAS status?
Jerry Clark wrote:
> More relevantly, it is posulated as highly likely that, starting with a random
> Life
> formation, SAS's will evolve of their own accord. One proves this by showing
> that
> our UTM is also a universal construct
I've done a little more research on MWI and QTI, and I have a few questions.
First of all, there is a theorem which states that choosing a random
number out of a set of n numbers, labelled 1 to n, will give a general idea
of the size of the set. For example, if the randomly chosen number is
Jerry Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think that it means anything to say whether one is in a universe with
> an infinite future or not: In an all-universe model there are many universes
> which have identical copies of 'you' in them and there is no meaning to saying
> which one of the
4 matches
Mail list logo
