-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 13 xxx -1, Marchal wrote:
> Then you can, in fact you must, reduce the mind-body problem into the
> problem of why machines believes in laws, matter and universe.
This is all that I am interested in. To me, it doesn't matter if there
is one universe, no u
Fabien Besnard wrote:
>I surely am [materialist], as anyone should be when dealing about a
> scientific subject.
This is a rather dogmatic assertion. See my posts, or my thesis* for a
proof
that computationnalism entails materialism contradict very weak form
of Occam.
Bruno
* which you can do
>From: Higgo James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: this very moment
>Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:26:35 +0100
>
>Jacques is right: there is no first person, so the distinction is spurious.
>'you' have no 'future' so it's meaningless to try to predic
- Original Message -
From: Scott D. Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
4 matches
Mail list logo