Re: this very moment

2000-05-13 Thread Scott D. Yelich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On 13 xxx -1, Marchal wrote: > Then you can, in fact you must, reduce the mind-body problem into the > problem of why machines believes in laws, matter and universe. This is all that I am interested in. To me, it doesn't matter if there is one universe, no u

Re: this very moment

2000-05-13 Thread Marchal
Fabien Besnard wrote: >I surely am [materialist], as anyone should be when dealing about a > scientific subject. This is a rather dogmatic assertion. See my posts, or my thesis* for a proof that computationnalism entails materialism contradict very weak form of Occam. Bruno * which you can do

RE: this very moment

2000-05-13 Thread Fritz Griffith
>From: Higgo James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: this very moment >Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:26:35 +0100 > >Jacques is right: there is no first person, so the distinction is spurious. >'you' have no 'future' so it's meaningless to try to predic

Re: this very moment

2000-05-13 Thread Alastair Malcolm
- Original Message - From: Scott D. Yelich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>