>From: Higgo James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: this very moment
>Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:26:35 +0100
>
>Jacques is right: there is no first person, so the distinction is spurious.
>'you' have no 'future' so it's meaningless to try to predict it
>

Well yes, that's true, if you define 'you' as a single observer moment.  My 
question to Jacques is, if you do not believe in the 1st person phenomenon, 
then how do you explain probability (which you say does exist)?
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to