>From: Higgo James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: this very moment
>Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:26:35 +0100
>Jacques is right: there is no first person, so the distinction is spurious.
>'you' have no 'future' so it's meaningless to try to predict it

Well yes, that's true, if you define 'you' as a single observer moment.  My 
question to Jacques is, if you do not believe in the 1st person phenomenon, 
then how do you explain probability (which you say does exist)?
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to