Hal Ruhl wrote:
>This is particularly due to my stand that true random noise is
>inherent in each universe within the Everything.
Remember that true random noise appear in the UDA because we don't know
in which computation ("universe") we belong. So random noise does
not need to be added. It is
Marchal wrote:
>
> This is one of my motivation for thinking that consciousness
> and consistency share the formula:
>
>-[]c
>
> Saying just that c (consistency, consciousness) is not provable,
> not finitely communicable, ... ineffable?
>
> Goedel's second theorem: c -> -[]c(c = <>
Robert W. wrote:
>Let's be clear on the meaning of *logic*. Logic as a
>reasoning power existed before the discipline of
>formalized logic.
>
>One can have a very powerful logical reasoning
>facility without having attented a course on the
>subject.
I agree. I guess some misunderstandings came
Robert W. wrote in part:
>One must realize in the attempt to constrain common
>everyday experience to a finite conceptual space,
>that something will be lost in the translation.
Brent Meeker answered in part
(to Robert W., in the invisible post):
>> Of course, ineffable mystical experiences w
Dear Bruno:
At , you wrote:
>Hal Ruhl wrote:
>
> >This is particularly due to my stand that true random noise is
> >inherent in each universe within the Everything.
>
>Remember that true random noise appear in the UDA because we don't know
>in which computation ("universe") we belong. So random n
Russell Standish wrote:
>> If treasures were not hidden in the mud, they would not be treasures :-)
>>
>
>I suspect your words came out wrong here - do you mean "A treasure
>hidden by mud is still a treasure"? Which, of course I agree with.
Thanks for correcting my words.
>I would be ecstat
Bruno said:
>
> I agree. I guess some misunderstandings came from that
> double sens. I do use "logic" as a branch of math.
>
> To be sure I don't believe that logic is a special
> branch capable to provide foundation for the other
> part of math. This is the philosophical logicist thesis
> which
Hello Marchal
On 07-May-01, Marchal wrote:
> Robert W. wrote in part:
>
>> One must realize in the attempt to constrain common
>> everyday experience to a finite conceptual space,
>> that something will be lost in the translation.
>
>
> Brent Meeker answered in part
> (to Robert W., in the inv
8 matches
Mail list logo
