Saibal Mitra wrote:
Bruno wrote:
At 16:25 +0200 11/10/1996, Saibal Mitra wrote:
You can still have realism, but it must be the case that at least some
of
the things we think of as ``real physical objects´´ like e.g. electrons
are
not real.
What would that mean? What would be real? Even in my
Gordon wrote:
But you have an inconsistent idea in that on the one hand a theory which
say that they are physical object that becoame no physical and then just
comp pure comp.Now although I dont thing it that narrow just like the
old Clock work view, I do think that your theory can be simpler in
Refinements to the next stages of my model.
Proposal
A type #2 universe can look and evolve like our universe.
Justification: Stage 1
Designate the succession of states for universe j as Sj(i) and its
representative binary bit string as Uj(i) where i runs over some range of
integers from 1
3 matches
Mail list logo
