Re: Numbers

Georges Quénot wrote: > peterdjones wrote: > > Georges Quenot wrote: > >> [...] > >> The question of whether there could be other type of objects > >> than mathematical is a different one. I can figure what could > >> mathematical objects and that they can exist (though I am > >> afraid I cannot

Re: Numbers

--- 1Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... > > >Two centuries ago, people weren't able to figure > > out *how* complex living beings could have emerged > from simple > > and inert matter and they thought too that this > was impossible > > and that they had to choose another default > "explanation"

Re: Numbers

peterdjones wrote: > Georges Quénot wrote: >> peterdjones wrote: >>> Georges Quenot wrote: [...] The question of whether there could be other type of objects than mathematical is a different one. I can figure what could mathematical objects and that they can exist (though I am