Le 06-févr.-07, à 03:06, Russell Standish a écrit :
> The informatic "destructive effects" are due to conflicting
> information reducing the total amount of information.
Perhaps you could expand?
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Le 07-févr.-07, à 02:45, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
> Given an uncountably infinite number of objects generated from a
> countably infinite list of properties and an uncountably infinite
> number of UD's in the metaphor I can not see an issue with this re my
> model. As I said above "Our World" can
Le 07-févr.-07, à 17:34, Mark Peaty a écrit :
> Bruno: 'Dont hesitate to ask why, I am sure few people have
> understand the whole point. Some are close to it, perhaps by having
> figure this out by themselves.'
>
> MP: Don't look at me boss ... I'm just glad I don't have to
> understand 'it
Le 07-févr.-07, à 18:06, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
> Mark Peaty skrev: And next: what do you mean by 'exist'?
>
>
> Our Universe is a mathemathical possibility. That is why our
> Universe exists. Every mathematically possible Universe exists in the
> same way. But we can not get in touch w
Le 08-févr.-07, à 00:10, John M a écrit :
> Mark:
> fascinating. I like to ask such stupid questions myself.
>
> On my question 'what is consciousness' the best answer I got was:
> "everybody knows it" from a prof-fessional.
> (Yes, but everybody knows it differently).
>
> Existence??? I won
Le 08-févr.-07, à 23:42, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> John,
>
> I agree: being open-minded is more important than being "right".
OK, but being open-minded would be meaningless if the notion of being
right was meaningless. Being open-minded means being open to the idea
that someone els
Jason,
the site is great, maybe greater than I can realize today.
I, as a practical computer illiterate, (never learned any computerese courses,
not even from books) sat before it with awe, - admiring that it works!
I might have missed it when I tried: I did not find a place "to look up" topics
On Feb 9, 7:59 am, "John M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> the site is great, maybe greater than I can realize today.
> I, as a practical computer illiterate, (never learned any computerese
> courses, not even from books) sat before it with awe, - admiring that it
> works!
> I might h
Jason,
just about the technicalities: I tried the main page with 2-3 topics and the
result was "no such title". Categories I did not venture into, because to
find the right wording/spelling requires familiarity in our lingo and I had
in mind to educate the innocent(ignorant) by passers outside Brun
Bruno, I 'may' come back to your (appreciated) remarks, to the last 'why' I
respond:
"Because I feel my head in all these ideas - back-and-forth - like looking
at a busy beehive and trying to follow ONE particular bee in it."
John
On 2/9/07, Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 08-f
John M mentioned in a recent post that many on the Everything List may
have conflicting or poor understandings of all the various terminology
used on the list. Hal Ruhl brought up the fact that someone had
previously tried to maintain an acronym list and FAQ for the
Everything List. I thought tha
11 matches
Mail list logo