Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

Brent: ' Which scientists...ours of theirs?' MP: Ours. The situation is not static; they would have to KEEP responding to our scientists' unpredictable forays into basic science, unpredictable a-priori either to them or to us. Regards Mark Peaty CDES [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.arach.net.

Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

Nice try, Brent John On 2/24/07, Brent Meeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > John Mikes wrote: > > This has been a long discussion between Jason and Mark. How do I get > > into it is > > by Mark's remark: > > "I don't think I go anywhere as far as John M. in this but then maybe > that > > is jus

Re: [SPAM] Believing in Divine Destiny is one of the pillars of faith, and, in accordance with this belief, everything in the universe is determined by God, the All-Mighty. While there are countless a

1. Could you, [EMAIL PROTECTED], please spell out what YOU understand by the meaning of the term 'scientific method'. 2. RE: 'The expression Manifest Book symbolizes the Destiny Actual, which is a title for Divine Will and God's creational and operational laws of the

Re: Evidence for the simulation argument

- Original Message - From: Brent Meeker To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 5:35 PM Subject: Re: Evidence for the simulation argument (Brent wrote): "The point is that the simulation doesn't have to simulate the whole complicated uni