Brent: '

Which scientists...ours of theirs?'

MP: Ours. The situation is not static; they would have to KEEP 
responding to our scientists' unpredictable forays into basic science, 
unpredictable a-priori either to them or to us.

Regards

Mark Peaty  CDES

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.arach.net.au/~mpeaty/

 



Brent Meeker wrote:
> Mark Peaty wrote:
>> Brent: '
>> the simulation doesn't have to simulate the whole complicated universe, 
>> only the part we can investigate and understand'
>>
>> MP: as I argued in my response to Stathis, the 'part we can investigate 
>> and understand' can be ever expanding and the exactitude of our 
>> understanding can in time reach just about arbitrarily fine degrees of 
>> resolution. Or, which would be more the worry for 'emulators' who wished 
>> to remain invisible, the emulation would need to be able to be 
>> controlled to a finer resolution than scientists' contemporary 
>> measurement skills.
>
> Which scientists...ours of theirs?  
>
> I don't disagree, but suppose the level at which we could see it was a 
> simulation was the Planck scale.  This is not entirely speculative, since the 
> Planck scale is where a conflict between quantum mechanics and general 
> relativity must manifest itself.  If the Simulators were only interested in 
> how the world operates far above that level then maybe they were sloppy and 
> just left potential inconsistencies in the simulation.  The program will 
> crash when we do the right experiment to reveal it.  But that level is thirty 
> orders of magnitude smaller than anything we can reach now.
>
> Brent Meeker
>
>
> >
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to