Re: UDA paper

2008-02-20 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Mirek, I guess you are busy. I would just like to insist that when I say (14-febr.-08): Please note that the 1-indeterminacy I am talking about in the third step is really a pure classical indeterminacy. It arises from the fact that my classical state is duplicable, and then I cannot

Re: UDA paper

2008-02-20 Thread Mirek Dobsicek
Hi Bruno, yes, I am now a bit busy. Lecturing, seminars,.. wedding planning :-) I am somewhere in the middle your paper. Regarding the very point of the described 1-indeterminancy, I have no problem there at all. Anyone who ever called a fork() unix function (read, cut, duplicate) followed by

[no subject]

2008-02-20 Thread Lennart Nilsson
-Ursprungligt meddelande- Fr=E5n: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F=F6r Bruno Marchal Skickat: den 20 februari 2008 15:21 Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =C4mne: Re: UDA paper It arises from the fact that my classical state is duplicable... And of course your quantumstate is