Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-23 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 22 Jan 2009, at 13:21, Kim Jones wrote: > Bruno, > > I found this an incredibly moving reply. I also see clearly your > points. I am glad to have given you an opportunity to state so > clearly some profoundly important ideas. Thank you, and let's > continue the voyage. OK, thanks. ASAP

Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-23 Thread John Mikes
Bruno, thanks for 4z1, I find it an exciting (although not in all details for me followable text) in beautiful French (your language!) which I have to pronounce (silently) to understand (mostly) and did not study all along so far. Also the supporting lit is remarkable - it was decades ago when I w

View this page "Resources"

2009-01-23 Thread Guenther
Hi, I compiled some resources concerning the discussions taking place here, maybe interesting for newcomers - it is highly eclectic, suggestions for additions welcome. Click on http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list/web/resources - or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if th

Re: blend of ancient and modern cosmogenesis or "creations stories" and inquiry into the relevance of love

2009-01-23 Thread bardiasoro...@gmail.com
Oh and lastly, can anyone conceive of the possibility of rather then finite universes, a "big bang" or "creation" or whatever, instantaneously flashed omnipresently. for example, take the view of boundless space, and then in a sudden and instantaneous flash, the whole is illuminated, and then div

Re: blend of ancient and modern cosmogenesis or "creations stories" and inquiry into the relevance of love

2009-01-23 Thread Bardia Soroudi
although none of that takes into consideration the question of consciousness posed to itself. If consciousness even is a self or "perceiver", or just a view viewed that is unreflective of "the viewing". "The viewing" because can "a viewer" view itself if it is what is viewing? Can "a perceiver" be

Re: blend of ancient and modern cosmogenesis or "creations stories" and inquiry into the relevance of love

2009-01-23 Thread bardiasoro...@gmail.com
has this group discourse passed it's prime or is it still hot and running? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com

Re: blend of ancient and modern cosmogenesis or "creations stories" and inquiry into the relevance of love

2009-01-23 Thread bardiasoro...@gmail.com
oh, and that perspective or whatever, quoted above, is sometimes called "subjective homogeneity". --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everythi

Re: View this page "Resources"

2009-01-23 Thread Russell Standish
Looks like a good resource! Good work! I was going to suggest adding a link to the ever-nascent Everything Wiki, but it seems to have vanished into an alternative universe. Are you still around Jason? Cheers On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:52:43PM -0800, Guenther wrote: > > Hi, > > I compiled some

Re: blend of ancient and modern cosmogenesis or "creations stories" and inquiry into the relevance of love

2009-01-23 Thread Tom Caylor
Hi, Bardia. Welcome, although I haven't participated much here myself lately. I've been too busy following my heart, although these discussions also do touch on something down deep for me. I'll comment briefly off the top of my head, but hopefully from my heart. On Jan 23, 4:23 pm, "bardiasor

Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-23 Thread Kim Jones
On 24/01/2009, at 4:02 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > Have you find the time to take a look on UN-16 UN-24 in > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/bxlthesis/Volume1CC/4z1_1sansp.pdf > > After all, you know some french, isn't it? Take it easy, I will > explain all this to you, beginning from ze