Re: Altered states of consciousness

2009-04-01 Thread Quentin Anciaux
2009/3/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be Hello Quentin, Le 30-mars-09, à 20:03, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : 2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:03, Quentin Anciaux wrote: Hi, 2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be Hi Kelly, and others, Well,

Re: Altered states of consciousness

2009-04-01 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
2009/4/1 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be: A historian could come along and argue for one reason and another that the Middle Ages should not be considered to have ended until the year 1800, and although we might disagree with him we can't say that he is wrong in the same way he would be

Re: Altered states of consciousness

2009-04-01 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 01 Apr 2009, at 11:30, Quentin Anciaux wrote: 2009/3/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be Hello Quentin, Le 30-mars-09, à 20:03, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : 2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:03, Quentin Anciaux wrote: Hi, 2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal

Re: Altered states of consciousness

2009-04-01 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 31 Mar 2009, at 19:06, Brent Meeker wrote: Yet they assume we are our bodies; otherwise duplicating the body wouldn't duplicate the self. We just bet on a level such that the self is incarnate in a digital way by the body. Suppose the duplication were performed this way. You

Re: Altered states of consciousness

2009-04-01 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 01 Apr 2009, at 12:39, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: 2009/4/1 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be: A historian could come along and argue for one reason and another that the Middle Ages should not be considered to have ended until the year 1800, and although we might disagree with him we