2009/3/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
Hello Quentin,
Le 30-mars-09, à 20:03, Quentin Anciaux a écrit :
2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:03, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
Hi Kelly, and others,
Well,
2009/4/1 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
A
historian could come along and argue for one reason and another that
the Middle Ages should not be considered to have ended until the year
1800, and although we might disagree with him we can't say that he is
wrong in the same way he would be
On 01 Apr 2009, at 11:30, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2009/3/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
Hello Quentin,
Le 30-mars-09, à 20:03, Quentin Anciaux a écrit :
2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 30 Mar 2009, at 17:03, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Hi,
2009/3/30 Bruno Marchal
On 31 Mar 2009, at 19:06, Brent Meeker wrote:
Yet they assume we are our bodies; otherwise duplicating the body
wouldn't duplicate the self.
We just bet on a level such that the self is incarnate in a digital
way by the body.
Suppose the duplication were performed
this way. You
On 01 Apr 2009, at 12:39, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
2009/4/1 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
A
historian could come along and argue for one reason and another that
the Middle Ages should not be considered to have ended until the
year
1800, and although we might disagree with him we
5 matches
Mail list logo