Brent all physical measurements will be rational numbers
Well, it is quite a statement ;o) so you may write down an exact
Planck constant (h), please illustrate that...
If you experience difficulty to do that for ( h ) please try write
down an exact gravitational constant ( G )...
Ref: Planck
Hi Kim, Marty, and others
On 23 Jul 2009, at 15:48, m.a. wrote:
Yes, this is all clear to me. But when I try to
put it into practice, confusion reigns. (See bottom of page.) By the
way, because I'm printing out your lessons and often need to refer
back to specific
Bruno,
You overlooked the question at the bottom of the page that I tried
unsuccessfully to work out. Brent supplied the answer but what I was looking
for were the steps that lead up to the answer. marty
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To:
On 24 Jul 2009, at 14:20, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
You overlooked the question at the bottom of the page
that I tried unsuccessfully to work out. Brent supplied the answer
but what I was looking for were the steps that lead up to the
answer. marty
- Original Message
Hi Marty, Kim, and all those who need some math revision (for the
seventh step of the Universal Dovetailer Argument).
I think, from the preceding post, that it is a good time to recall
some basic definitions. And to introduce new one.
The set of natural numbers, or positive integers is N
stefanba...@yahoo.com wrote:
Brent all physical measurements will be rational numbers
Well, it is quite a statement ;o) so you may write down an exact
Planck constant (h), please illustrate that...
If you experience difficulty to do that for ( h ) please try write
down an exact
6 matches
Mail list logo
