On 19 Feb 2011, at 00:46, Travis Garrett wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Sorry for the slow reply, I have been working on various things and
also catching up on the many conversations (and naming conventions) on
this board. And thanks for your interest! -- I think I have
discovered a giant "low hanging
Dear Bruno,
let me reply in fragments - your two responses are too comprehensive for one
post for me.
So for now: T R U T H .
*"I am a neoneoplatonist believer, John, I believe in truth, and that is
the motor of my research."*
is IMO very different from your: *"Now what is a truth?..."* you go o
On 2/19/2011 9:17 AM, John Mikes wrote:
Dear Bruno,
let me reply in fragments - your two responses are too comprehensive
for one post for me.
So for now: T R U T H .
/"I am a neoneoplatonist believer, John, I believe *_in truth_*, and
that is the motor of my research."/
is IMO very different
Original Message
Subject:[BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Robert L. Park 18 Feb 2011
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:26:25 -0500
From: Robert Park
Reply-To: whats...@bobpark.org
To: bobparks-whats...@listserv.umd.edu
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 18 Fe
A bit off topic question. How embryogenesis fits comp, digital physics,
ALG, and other diverse points of view expressed here? What mind-body
research says about the development of mind from a single cell and then
its death?
Evgenii
P.S. By the way, in Second Life there is course where Prof Go
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> Isn't it enough to say everything that we *could* describe
>> in mathematics exists "in platonia"?
>
> The problem is that we can describe much more things than the one we
> are able to show consistent, so if you allow what we could describe
> you take too much. If
On 2/19/2011 3:39 PM, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Isn't it enough to say everything that we *could* describe
in mathematics exists "in platonia"?
The problem is that we can describe much more things than the one we
are able to show consistent, so if you allow what we
7 matches
Mail list logo
