Let us take Benard cells for example. It is a good idea. I guess that in
this case the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with the Boussinesq
approximation for free convection should suffer.
If I understand correctly, bifurcation in this case arises when we
increase the temperature differe
I have found Logistic Map
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogisticMap.html
Here the system has very different outcomes depending from initial
conditions (now I understand your use of statistics). Yet, each
trajectory is deterministic.
Hence, this was not my question. Sorry for being unclear. Bi
On 14.03.2012 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/14/2012 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in this
engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute equilibria, and
see what happens.
It is relative not just to the inf
On 15.03.2012 22:58 Russell Standish said the following:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25:01PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try t
On 3/25/2012 2:43 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let us take Benard cells for example. It is a good idea. I guess that in this case the
incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with the Boussinesq approximation for free
convection should suffer.
If I understand correctly, bifurcation in this case ari
On Mar 24, 3:58 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> OK, nice. Many confuse comp (I am a machine) and digital physics
> (reality is a machine), but comp makes reality, whatever it can be,
> being NOT a machine, nor the output of a machine. It is more a
> perspective effect on infinities of computations.
On 3/25/2012 2:46 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/25/2012 2:43 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Let us take Benard cells for example. It is a good idea. I guess that
in this case the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with the
Boussinesq approximation for free convection should suffer.
If I understand
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 03:49:17PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
>
> Do you mean that the Laplace deamon would not agree with the Second Law?
>
> Evgenii
>
Yes - there is no second law for the Laplace daemon. Each microstate
is distinct and equiprobable.
Cheers
--
---
On 3/25/2012 6:44 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/14/2012 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in this
engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute equilibria, and
see what
9 matches
Mail list logo
