On 15.03.2012 22:58 Russell Standish said the following:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25:01PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
this engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute
equilibria, and see what happens.
I take Denbigh& Denbigh's position that entropy is not subjective, but
rather fixed by convention. Conventions can be entirely
objective. This should assuage those engineers you speak of.
Could you please explain a bit more what you mean? What does it mean
to fix something by convention?
We take certain macro variables as thermodynamic state variables,
rather than others. A Laplace daemon would not agree with that.
Its better explained in Denbigh& Denbigh, but Brent Meeker has also
been making the same point.
Do you mean that the Laplace deamon would not agree with the Second Law?
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at