Re: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread Russell Standish
Re Larmarkian evolution, cultural evolution is usually considered to be an examplar of Lamarkian evolution. Knowledge accumulated in one life is passed onto the next via books, or in the very olden day oral stories. Cheers -- -

Re: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote: > >> >> It's not news that some chemicals increase the rate of mutation. >> > > > > > Epigenetic changes that effect what is transcribed is not mutation – at > least in the classic sense of changing – i.e. mutating – the underlyin

Re: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread John Clark
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Russell Standish wrote: > Re Larmarkian evolution, cultural evolution is usually considered to be > an examplar of Lamarkian evolution. Knowledge accumulated in one life is > passed onto the next via books, or in the very olden day oral stories. > Yes but even the

Re: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread Russell Standish
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 12:36:27PM -0400, John Clark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Russell Standish > wrote: > > > Re Larmarkian evolution, cultural evolution is usually considered to be > > an examplar of Lamarkian evolution. Knowledge accumulated in one life is > > passed onto the n

RE: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread Chris de Morsella
John, Russell ~ Speaking from the perspective of information science, one can abstract out the underlying information encoding scheme(s), actually employed by life & by conscious self-aware life as well, which could be any number of suitable candidates. We know of three known currently employed enc

RE: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread chris peck
Hi Chris and John The paper I linked to describes a evolutionary dynamic which emphasizes horizontal over vertical genetic transfer. I think it is described in the paper as Lamarckian because changes to the coding mechanism can occur in their model within a single generation of organisms rathe

RE: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread Chris de Morsella
Hello Chris ~ When one factors in group dynamics in addition to the individual ones at play it is as you suggest more nuanced. I have heard this survival of the community dynamics being used to suggest why for example we still have behaviors such as altruism still quite common amongst members of ou

Re: Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong

2013-08-11 Thread meekerdb
On 8/11/2013 7:55 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote: I would not be surprised to find that there is evidence of cross species conglomerates of organisms that have evolved to survive together, in other words that the Darwinian selection mechanism could potentially be extended to take into account both