On 20 Jun 2015, at 01:26, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Bruno Marchal got the feeling that John Clark develops an allergy
to pronouns. From Bruno Marchal's long time experience, the roots of
the allergy is guessed to come from the
On 19 Jun 2015, at 23:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/19/2015 8:41 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 16 Jun 2015, at 01:41, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/15/2015 8:15 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Therefore, perhaps proof of truth is an unattainable goal in
math. Perhaps proof of truth is an unattainable goal
On 6/21/2015 8:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Z is what the machine can say about the []p t points of view (like the bet that you
will have coffee in the modified step 3 protocol).[]coffee means you get coffee in all
consistent extensions (which in this protocol are W and M), and t is the
On Jun 21, 2015 12:35 AM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
I had a slightly different answer, but didn't post yesterday, because
I wanted to see what answers other people had.
My answer is to follow this protocol: if the door is closed, duplicate
yourself. If the door is open,
On 19 Jun 2015, at 18:36, Terren Suydam wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 15 Jun 2015, at 15:32, Terren Suydam wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
We can, as nobody could pretend to have
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com wrote:
How on earth could exchanging the position of two identical things make
a difference either objectively or subjectively, how could you even know
that such a exchange had even been made? In fact I can't think of a better
On 19 Jun 2015, at 23:32, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/19/2015 10:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jun 2015, at 02:36, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:11 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
meekerdb wrote:
On 6/18/2015 1:10 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, meekerdb
On 21 Jun 2015, at 05:27, Terren Suydam wrote:
The key is that both JC1 and JC2 would feel like they are John
Clark. They would both remember walking into the duplicator and then
emerging from it, one way or the other, and despite having different
thoughts and experiments from one
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:21 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com wrote:
How on earth could exchanging the position of two identical things make
a difference either objectively or subjectively, how could you even know
that
http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
If Bruno Marchal abandoned personal pronouns then Bruno Marchal would be
FORCED to keep those 1-3 person view distinction straight all along the
thought experience,
That does not follow.
So even then Bruno Marchal would not be
On 6/21/2015 8:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jun 2015, at 23:32, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/19/2015 10:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Jun 2015, at 02:36, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/18/2015 4:11 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
meekerdb wrote:
On 6/18/2015 1:10 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18,
12 matches
Mail list logo
