On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 Terren Suydam <[email protected]> wrote:

>> How on earth could exchanging the position of two identical things make
>> a difference either objectively or subjectively, how could you even know
>> that such a exchange had even been made? In fact I can't think of a better
>> definition of "two identical things": Two things are identical if and only
>> if exchanging their position makes no difference to anybody or anything.
>>
>
> > Because they're not identical.
>

If they are not identical then the logical course of action for them to do
would be the same as what you'd expect people to do in everyday life and
absolutely no insight is gained by the thought experiment, it's just a
pointless waste of time.

> What is irrelevant for the purposes of this experiment is that the two
> copies are identical.
>

Then things are d-u-l-l.


> >>> I know you've seen The Prestige. Spoiler alert for everyone else...
>>> Anyway, it's like the scene where Hugh Jackman's character duplicates
>>> himself for the first time, and he shoots his duplicate as soon as he
>>> realizes what's happened.
>>>
>>
>> >> In that scene the two diverge very very quickly because one is
>> pointing a gun at the other and one expects to die in a few seconds and one
>> does not. That's about as big a difference in environmental conditions as
>> you can get.
>>
>
> > Exactly, and that's where things are headed inside the room, as soon as
> one of the JohnClarkian bodies opens the door.
>

No, not if when that door is opened one of the collection of atoms arranged
in a johnclarkian way is disrupted instantaneously, or at least too fast to
form a last thought. In that scene from The Prestige one of them DID have a
last thought and the other did not, and that last thought was "I am about
to die". I don't like any last thought but especially that one.

>> If they don't remain identical identical then they are no longer copies,
>> they're  just two people in a room, and the thought experiment no longer
>> has a point.
>>
>
> > Not at all. They both share the same memories (up until shortly after
> the duplication) and would both feel like they are John Clark and continue
> to identify as John Clark.
>

If they were no longer identical then they would both have an equal right
to call themselves "John Clark" BUT they would no longer be each other, and
so in matters of life and death they would both act in their individual
self interest just as any 2 people you picked off the street at random
would do.

> Thanks for the precision. Two collections of atoms arranged in a
> Johnclarkian way.  Of course, as you said yourself, we can admit minor
> differences in those arrangements and still consider them Johnclarkian e.g.
> "If an electron in a calcium atom in the fingernail of one is in a higher
> energy band than the other I'm not going to worry about it."  Obviously
> once there are differences like that we have diverged on the quantum level.
>

But in questions of personal identity I'm not interested in the quantum
level I'm only interested in the macroscopic level, the level capable of
forming thoughts. Yes quantum events in a biological brain may (or may not,
nobody is sure) grow and eventually become macroscopic, but that cumulative
change will take time, and until that happens quantum stuff is irrelevant.


> > The important thing with this experiment - which informs the way it was
> constructed - is not that the copies don't diverge on the quantum level,
> but that the copies both identify as the same person.
>

After they diverge they will still both identify with the same person, John
Clark, HOWEVER they no longer will identify with each other, and both would
consider their life to be more important than that other fellow who
happened to have the same name. Before they diverged things would be very
different, there would be no other fellow, there would only be one.

 John K Clark



>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to