Tegmark's new book

Has there been any consensus as to the value or worth in buying this book? If not so there is a numerical GR book next in the queue. Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin

Tegmark's new book

Liz I should have typed which of the two diametrically opposed camps has the most members in it. For another try I have read the following: arXiv:0704.0646 [pdf, ps, other] Title: The Mathematical Universe Authors: Max Tegmark (MIT) arXiv:0707.2593 [pdf, ps, other] Title: Many lives in many wor

Tegmark and UDA

Assuming chaotic inflation there is no consensus that the multiverse is past infinite but some papers have try to show it is do. Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving ema

Boltzmann Brains rule out any theory?

Why Boltzmann Brains Are Bad Authors: Sean M. Carroll Comments: 27 pages. Invited submission to a volume on Current Controversies in Philosophy of Science, eds. Shamik Dasgupta and Brad Weslake Subjects: High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th); Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); G

Re: Digest for everything-list@googlegroups.com - 4 updates in 1 topic

Yes On Jan 15, 2015 12:55 PM, wrote: > everything-list@googlegroups.com > > Google > Groups > >

Lost and not lost?

I joined this list due to Tegmark's site, and got help on my multiverse talk. I have (tried) to read other threads and do not understand most of them. Some of which may be due to shared implicit knowledge. Some of which seems like philosophy and not proofs or calculations I can understand.not even

multiverse talk

I am giving a talk on the Multiverse to Star Trek fans in several weeks. I would appreciate any advice and suggestions, since as of now, I have an outline based on Tegmark's four levels. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to