As to "Algebraic Physics"; as well as to Wei Dai's ``everything''
questionnaire:
- possibly that it will be rather useful to read
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703043 , V5 (and the first couple of
pages in V1).
Note also briefly: the Universe (Universes ) is/are subsets of a very
specific set
Brian Tenneson:
> Why is the universe a subset of the set "information" (which I assume is
> defined in the article) and why can it not be formalized?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Zen_Ved <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
Wei Dai:
> I'm not sure what questionnaire Zen_Ved is referring to, but maybe it's this
> paragraph from the mailing list invitation:
>
> Because this mailing list attracts people from many different academic
> fields, and many posts have high technical content, it
Günther Greindl:
> From the questionnaire:
>
> >Why do we believe that both the past and the future are not
> >completely random, but the future is more random than the past?
>
> I didn't know we believed that *grin*.
>
>
> Cheers,
> G?nther
> G?nther Greindl
> Department of Philosophy of Scie
4 matches
Mail list logo
