On Sunday, October 13, 2013 11:26:49 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Oct 2013, at 15:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:04:53 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13 Oct 2013, at 08:35, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>>
>> Maybe this will help. Here are two cr
On 13 October 2013 19:35, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> *
> Presumption of repeatability* (PR) - By overlooking the possibility of
> absolute uniqueness, comp must conceive of all events as locally documented
> stereotypes of a Platonic template rather than true originals. This
> contradicts our intuit
On 13 Oct 2013, at 15:20, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:04:53 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Oct 2013, at 08:35, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Maybe this will help. Here are two criticisms of comp, and two
hypotheses which aim for a more mathematical treatment of PIP
On Sunday, October 13, 2013 6:04:53 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 13 Oct 2013, at 08:35, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Maybe this will help. Here are two criticisms of comp, and two hypotheses
> which aim for a more mathematical treatment of PIP principles under MSR.
> *
> Presumption of r
On 13 Oct 2013, at 08:35, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Maybe this will help. Here are two criticisms of comp, and two
hypotheses which aim for a more mathematical treatment of PIP
principles under MSR.
Presumption of repeatability (PR) - By overlooking the possibility
of absolute uniqueness,
Maybe this will help. Here are two criticisms of comp, and two hypotheses
which aim for a more mathematical treatment of PIP principles under MSR.
*
Presumption of repeatability* (PR) - By overlooking the possibility of
absolute uniqueness, comp must conceive of all events as locally documented
6 matches
Mail list logo