Re: Please read me !!!

2013-06-22 Thread John Mikes
Roger, we 'read' you too much. If you have to use this silly word (Ccness): I'm preaching over the past 21 years that it is a PROCESS. As in: RESPONSE TO RELATIONS. No Leibnitz or else, no 'subject' or 'object' no fuss. It is a basic process to the TOTALITY (not human,not fellow DNA-bearers, not ev

Re: Please read me !!!

2013-06-22 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 22 Jun 2013, at 15:54, Roger Clough wrote: For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you that consciousness = subject + object but you people keep trying to solve the problem consciousness = object. Absolutely not. On the contrary, object are mental or dreamed content.

Re: Please read me !!!

2013-06-22 Thread John Clark
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you > that > consciousness = subject + object > but you people keep trying to solve the problem > consciousness = object. > If people don't read you it's because they don't see the

Please read me !!!!

2013-06-22 Thread Roger Clough
For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you that consciousness = subject + object but you people keep trying to solve the problem consciousness = object. which is useful to some extent, but is not consciousness. That's materialism and it's the wrong problem. Only by using

Please read me !!!

2013-06-22 Thread Roger Clough
For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you that consciousness = subject + object but you people keep trying to solve the problem consciousness = object. which is useful to some extent, but is not consciousness. That's materialism and it's the wrong problem. Only by using