RE: Can we ever know truth? - simulation

2006-08-12 Thread John M
Nick: the practical - philosopher. I refer to my 'misunderstood' expression to Bruno: NAME Calling (which was a pun, meaning we call names and assign meaning to it - in our OWN mindset, then fight for THIS meaning against another person's meaning called by the same NAME) - Bruno misunderstood

Re: Can we ever know truth? - simulation

2006-08-12 Thread 1Z
I think this is wrongheaded. You doubt that you really assume things are how they appear to me - the Earth appears flat, wood appears solid, and electrons don't appear at all. What one does is build, or learn, a model that fits the world and comports with how they appear. I see no reason

RE: Can we ever know truth? - simulation

2006-08-11 Thread Nick Prince
This is a form of solipsism - it is difficult to attack it and defending it can be similarly time consuming. I think we have to move on and believe there is a better approach if only to get somewhere other than back to the beginning every time. - Original Message

Re: Can we ever know truth? - simulation

2006-08-11 Thread Brent Meeker
Nick Prince wrote: This is a form of solipsism - it is difficult to attack it and defending it can be similarly time consuming. I think we have to move on and believe there is a better approach – if only to get somewhere other than back to the beginning every time.