On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:02 PM, John Mikes wrote:
> ​> ​
> Random is (IMO) out: how would you justify ANY of the physical laws and
> their consequences if 'random' occurrences may intrude
>
​
Easy, just change from "if X and Y then Z" to "if X and Y then usually Z".
In fact that is exactly what
On Friday, September 6, 2013 at 2:53:10 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
> On 9/6/2013 1:02 PM, John Mikes wrote:
>
> Evgeniy, it was a while ago when I read (and enjoyed) David Bohm.
> Since then I modified many of my ideas and included 'newer' ideas into
> them. I cannot resort to ancient (?) thinker
Fantastic group. Been looking for people to continue those valuable
conversations. I'm listening to them every single day sometimes all day
long and deep into the night. Jiddu Krishnamurti is The ultimate
philosopher. David Bohm is the only one during his life time who understood
him.
On Su
I have finished reading the book. As usual, there is no direct answer.
Well,
p. 220 "freedom is the creative perception of a new order of necessity."
Evgenii
--
http://blog.rudnyi.ru/tag/david-bohm
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List"
On 9/6/2013 1:02 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Evgeniy, it was a while ago when I read (and enjoyed) David Bohm.
Since then I modified many of my ideas and included 'newer' ideas into them. I cannot
resort to ancient (?) thinkers: our knowledge is evolving.
Random is (IMO) out: how would you justify ANY
Evgeniy, it was a while ago when I read (and enjoyed) David Bohm.
Since then I modified many of my ideas and included 'newer' ideas into
them. I cannot resort to ancient (?) thinkers: our knowledge is evolving.
Random is (IMO) out: how would you justify ANY of the physical laws and
their consequenc
On 02.09.2013 20:41 meekerdb said the following:
On 9/2/2013 10:11 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 01.09.2013 21:52 meekerdb said the following:
Unconditioned=random works.
I do not think so. I would say that
If we say that the unconditioned is random, then it would be
foolish for us to try to
On 9/2/2013 10:11 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 01.09.2013 21:52 meekerdb said the following:
Unconditioned=random works.
I do not think so. I would say that
If we say that the unconditioned is random, then it
would be foolish for us to try to do anything with the
conditioning.
?? How do you
On 01.09.2013 21:52 meekerdb said the following:
Unconditioned=random works.
I do not think so. I would say that
If we say that the unconditioned is random, then it
would be foolish for us to try to do anything with the
conditioning.
Evgenii
Brent
On 9/1/2013 6:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote
Unconditioned=random works.
Brent
On 9/1/2013 6:39 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I am reading David Bohm, Thought as a System. A few quotes below to the theme that is
quite often under discussion here.
Evgenii
p. 72 “We have to be able to think on this clearly; even though, as I said, that by
10 matches
Mail list logo