On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:51:56 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:48:10 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 3:33:28 PM UTC+2, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/5/2013 6:23 AM, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:48:10 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 3:33:28 PM UTC+2, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>>
>> On 3/5/2013 6:23 AM, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 1:16:15 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 3:33:28 PM UTC+2, Stephen Paul King wrote:
>
> On 3/5/2013 6:23 AM, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 1:16:15 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:53:12 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stephen,
On 3/5/2013 6:23 AM, advancedguida...@list.ru wrote:
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 1:16:15 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:53:12 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 25 Jan 2013, at 18:06, Stephen P. King wrote:
>
>
On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 1:16:15 PM UTC+2, advanced...@list.ru wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:53:12 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> On 25 Jan 2013, at 18:06, Stephen P. King wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Have you seen this? What implications does it have?
>> >
>
On Sunday, January 27, 2013 2:53:12 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 25 Jan 2013, at 18:06, Stephen P. King wrote:
>
> >
> >Have you seen this? What implications does it have?
> >
> > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.5340.pdf
>
> If the result is correct
Hi Stephen,
On 25 Jan 2013, at 18:06, Stephen P. King wrote:
Have you seen this? What implications does it have?
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1301/1301.5340.pdf
If the result is correct (which I think it is) it is a nice
generalization of Löb's theorem. It makes it somehow more so
7 matches
Mail list logo