Bruno
I'm glad you follow. As I've indicated, I've been inventing this grisly
teminology 'on the fly' in the attempt to make clearer some
distinctions that I didn't feel were explicit enough, and I've probably
found the process at least as irksome as others trying to follow it.
Colin's version is
Le 08-août-06, à 17:00, David Nyman a écrit :
>
> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> FP2: I do periphrases to talk about it. It is a confusing notion (cf
>> Chalmers "delusion"). Mathematically it needs bimodal logics (or just
>> G
>> handled with care);
>
> Bruno
>
> Thanks for the summary, I'll look o
Bruno Marchal wrote:
> FP2: I do periphrases to talk about it. It is a confusing notion (cf
> Chalmers "delusion"). Mathematically it needs bimodal logics (or just G
> handled with care);
Bruno
Thanks for the summary, I'll look out for the roadmap. I'd just like
to clarify the role of FP2 abov
3 matches
Mail list logo