On 1/4/2013 1:54 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
On morphic telepathy
Note that Leibniz for good reasons (similar to Kant)
did not consider time and space to be substances,
so the monads all exist as a dust of points in an
inextended domain (to use Descartes' concepts)
which is by definition outside of
STEPHAN: Is it necessary that monads are a substance? Could we think of
them as pure process the product of which is the content of experience
of the monad? Is this formulation antithetical to the definition that
Leibniz gives monads?
ROGER: Keep in mind that Leibniz formulated his ideas
On 1/4/2013 10:41 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
STEPHEN: Is it necessary that monads are a substance? Could we think of
them as pure process the product of which is the content of experience
of the monad? Is this formulation antithetical to the definition that
Leibniz gives monads?
ROGER: Keep in
3 matches
Mail list logo
