On 31 Dec 2012, at 18:55, Brian Tenneson wrote:
So is that a yes? If so, can you stipulate such a physical object?
On Sunday, December 30, 2012 9:08:27 PM UTC-8, Brent wrote:
On 12/30/2012 11:23 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Is there a physical object that exists physically which is not
On 31 Dec 2012, at 06:08, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/30/2012 11:23 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Is there a physical object that exists physically which is not
isomorphic to a mathematical object, having mathematical existence?
If it exists physically then it has at least one attribute that no
On 24 Dec 2012, at 19:11, Brian Tenneson wrote:
What do you think of Tegmark's version of a mathematical Platoia?
Too much naive, and too much big. Then Tegmark ignore the fact that we
are distributed in it, in a way which force the consciousness/matter
relation to be in need to be
3 matches
Mail list logo
