On 31 Dec 2012, at 06:08, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/30/2012 11:23 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
Is there a "physical" object that exists physically which is not
isomorphic to a mathematical object, having mathematical existence?
If it exists physically then it has at least one attribute that no
mathematical "object" has.
Indeed.
If it exists *primitively-physically* then it has at least one
attribute that no mathematical "object" has.
If it exist *non-primitively-physically* then it "existing physically"
will be a non trivial mathematical notion, which will distinguish
physical and mathematical existence.
That the case with comp. A physical object becomes a stable emerging,
from infinities of computations, pattern, as seen from a universal
number first person (sharable) point of view.
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
