On 24 Dec 2012, at 19:11, Brian Tenneson wrote:
What do you think of Tegmark's version of a mathematical Platoia?
Too much naive, and too much big. Then Tegmark ignore the fact that we
are distributed in it, in a way which force the consciousness/matter
relation to be in need to be derived from a very simple ontology (the
sigma_1 arithmetical truth).
Tegmark is a physicist closer than others with respect to the
computationalist hypothesis, but, despite his mathematicalism,
consciousness, and the origin of the "matter stable illusion" is still
under the rug.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/6WzRUmWbHY0J
.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.
