[Evolution-hackers] Evolution 2.0 UI proposal

2003-07-22 Thread Brent L. Damms
Hi Firstly, thanks for producing Evolution in the first place it's a great piece of software. The thing that's obvious about this, and a lot of proposals, is you can't please everyone. However, conceptually I'm not yet convinced that some of the proposal(s) will be accepted by a greater number

evo calendar extension WAS Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution as partof groupware projects in ST Louis

2003-07-22 Thread JT Moree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rodrigo Moya wrote: | On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 17:28, JT Moree wrote: | |Here is a summary of what we have though about and done about the Calendar functionality related to |Evolution: | |1) Open WebDav/http standards are used by Mozilla calendar, Apple

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Re: [evolution-patches] [PATCH] IMAPpreauth and subcommand connection.]

2003-07-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:09, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: Hmm actually this might work if we make the wording clear enough. (E.g. For the command-part, maybe it should probably just be called Advanced...?) I think I prefer 'Custom Command', since 'Advanced' could mean many other things. I'd like

Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Re: [evolution-patches] [PATCH] IMAPpreauth and subcommand connection.]

2003-07-22 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
This would work well with what I proposed above; we could advertise the %h and %u with a little blurb in the advanced dialog. True -- but don't we have context-specific help already? And a suitable default _using_ them will make it obvious too. It's nicer if the information is obvious

Re: [Evolution-hackers] removeCard call in Book CORBA objectresults in CORBA.BAD_OPERATION

2003-07-22 Thread Chris Toshok
hm, yeah that call should work just fine. Can you paste the code? Chris On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 12:31, Patrick Gerzanics wrote: I'm encountering a CORBA.BAD_OPERATION exception when trying to call the removeCard method on the Book CORBA object. According to the IDL: void removeCard (in

Re: [Evolution] question on autopick

2003-07-22 Thread Cynthia Gu
JP Could you please look into this issue On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 10:35, Cynthia Gu wrote: Hi, Can anybody help to answer this question: When new a meeting, on Schedule tab, when select All people and one resource from Autopick list, how do you specify which resource? Thank you!

Re: [Evolution] Facing dependency error in trying to installevolution 1.4.3 rpm

2003-07-22 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le mar 22/07/2003 à 00:08, Mark Gordon a écrit : On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 17:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to install the Evolution 1.4.3 rpm (from MDK Cooker) on a MDK 9.1 system... I'm getting dependency failure for the 3 required pm -- Text::ParseWords, diagnostics and

Re: [Evolution] Contacts runs like treacle

2003-07-22 Thread Panos Tsapralis (TELLAS)
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:33, Matthew Whimp wrote: I've just managed to convert my contacts over from kaddressbook. However, I am shocked at how resource hungry, and slow the contacts part of evolution is. Is this normal behaviour. In total, I have about 160 vCard entries in the contacts

Re: [Evolution] Contacts runs like treacle

2003-07-22 Thread Tom
Works perfectly fine here - Redhat 8.0, Evolution 1.0.8, Dell Latitude laptop, 512M RAM. On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 06:02, Panos Tsapralis (TELLAS) wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:33, Matthew Whimp wrote: I've just managed to convert my contacts over from kaddressbook. However, I am shocked

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: keep track of own mails in maillinglists]

2003-07-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 01:41, Mario Vukelic wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 02:02, David Woodhouse wrote: Should work fine. You look at References: not just In-Reply-To: Maybe I look for the wrong thing, but our little subthread here is inherited from a posting by [EMAIL PROTECTED] higher up.

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread Pragnesh Sampat
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 00:51, Not Zed wrote 1. running ssl to the same machine isn't much use unless you like exercising your cpu (i presume this is just testing though) It is for testing, yes. 2. make sure you have the certificate generated correctly, and assigned a unique name. I saw

Re: [Evolution] Contacts runs like treacle

2003-07-22 Thread Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
I wish I could say that I have no idea what you're talking about, but mine does exactly the same thing. I was running evo 1.4.3 on debian sid, with XF 4.3. Now I'm running evo 1.4.3 on Mandrake 9.1 with XF 4.3, and I evo absolutely bogs when I go to access my addressbook. And I have a P4 1.9G

Re: [Evolution] Help! No email folders available!

2003-07-22 Thread Grant Rutherford
From: Not Zed [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Grant Rutherford [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Evolution] Help! No email folders available! Date: 22 Jul 2003 12:09:01 +0930 On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 06:39, Grant Rutherford wrote: Hello again, I had a problem with evolution following

Re: [Evolution] question on autopick

2003-07-22 Thread JP Rosevear
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 17:30, Cynthia Gu wrote: JP Could you please look into this issue On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 10:35, Cynthia Gu wrote: Hi, Can anybody help to answer this question: When new a meeting, on Schedule tab, when select All people and one resource from Autopick

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 10:01, Pragnesh Sampat wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 00:51, Not Zed wrote 1. running ssl to the same machine isn't much use unless you like exercising your cpu (i presume this is just testing though) It is for testing, yes. 2. make sure you have the certificate

Re: to alarm or not to alarm (was: Re: [Evolution] Completelyunload Evolution from memory.)

2003-07-22 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 00:09, guenther wrote: which processes are those? evolution-wombat and evoution-alarm-notify should always be running. Rodrigo, I just wondered (nope, not using alarm normally): As these processes have to be running for notifying the user, shouldn't they be

Re: [Evolution] Help! No email folders available!

2003-07-22 Thread guenther
Please, cut out the irrelevant bits... [snipp] Does this information help anyone? Not a lot :-/ I have a suggestion though ... try the following commands in a terminal, after quitting evolution: cd evolution --force-shutdown There was an error with this command: Error on

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 11:15, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: 3. try using 'ssl always'. This appears to work. Why wouldn't 'whenever possible' work? 'whenever possible' only works for servers that are on the standard port that support the STARTTLS extension. ie, it only attempts 1

Re: to alarm or not to alarm (was: Re: [Evolution] Completelyunload Evolution from memory.)

2003-07-22 Thread Panos Tsapralis (TELLAS)
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 18:21, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 00:09, guenther wrote: which processes are those? evolution-wombat and evoution-alarm-notify should always be running. Rodrigo, I just wondered (nope, not using alarm normally): As these processes have to

Re: [Evolution] Contacts runs like treacle

2003-07-22 Thread Frank Burough
I have been following this thread and must admit I am a bit confused. I see maybe 3 to 4 second delay when I first open the contact list and I see similar delays when opening a particular letter. In addressing e-mail via the To: button, I see virtually no delay from the time of selecting a

Re: [Evolution] Help! No email folders available!

2003-07-22 Thread guenther
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:53, Grant Rutherford wrote: Yes, I am running version 1.2.2-5. Is these a similar procedure for my version? Nope, I don't think so. The 'killev' is effectively the same as ' evolution --force-shutdown'. But all your configuration data is stored in another place. Evo

[Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

2003-07-22 Thread Matthew Keller
Apologies if this has been asked before. The archives aren't readily searchable, or I'd've done some more research before posting it- I did search MY archives, but didn't find anything relevant. I'm using Evolution 1.4.3 and I can't create IMAP folders against a Courier IMAP server (latest

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread Pragnesh Sampat
This appears to work. Why wouldn't 'whenever possible' work? 'whenever possible' only works for servers that are on the standard port that support the STARTTLS extension. ie, it only attempts 1 connection. 'always' will attempt up to 2 connections to find a port with SSL support,

Re: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
I fail to see what the problem is...? According to the FAQ that you pasted, Evolution is doing exactly what the FAQ says it should. 2. Private folders are stored underneath the INBOX. hierarchy hence all folders are under the INBOX. Jeff Matthew Keller wrote: Apologies if this has been

[Evolution] Problems with addressbook?

2003-07-22 Thread Steve
I just upgraded to Evo 1.4.3 and now I've lost my address book.. There's a popup when I go to the Contacts folder: We were unable to open this addressbook. Please check that the path exists and that you have permission to access it On the command line I get: (evolution:3584): EBook-WARNING **:

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:53, Pragnesh Sampat wrote: o port 143 without SSL ('never') o port 143 with TLS ('whenever possible') o port 993 with SSL or TLS ('always') I think that's... Port 143 without TLS. ('never') Port 143 with TLS or without it. ('upgrade if possible')

RE: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread Dan Winship
o port 143 without SSL ('never') o port 143 with TLS ('whenever possible') o port 993 with SSL or TLS ('always') I think that's... Port 143 without TLS. ('never') Port 143 with TLS or without it. ('upgrade if possible') Port 993 with SSL or port 143 with TLS or

Re: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

2003-07-22 Thread Matthew Keller
I guess it IS open to interpretation. I interpret both the RFC and the FAQ answer as saying This is how mail is stored on the server, but compliant clients don't have to display the hierarchy that way. I'm not complaining. I personally couldn't care less as long as I can manipulate the tree

Re: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
sure, a client could flatten the tree into a list... but what if the user has folders named the same farther down in the tree? ie, what if I have INBOX.INBOX ? in a tree-like view, we'd see: INBOX INBOX but in a flat list we'd see: INBOX which INBOX is that INBOX? the toplevel? or the user

RE: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:14, Dan Winship wrote: No, I think you were right originally. Whenever possible should try both 993 and STARTTLS, but allow both to fail. There's no reason why someone would want to configure use TLS on port 143 if possible, but not 993. Depends how long it takes to

RE: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

2003-07-22 Thread Dan Winship
I guess it IS open to interpretation. I interpret both the RFC and the FAQ answer as saying This is how mail is stored on the server, but compliant clients don't have to display the hierarchy that way. The FAQ probably does say that, but it's wrong.

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
right, hence the way it is done now. Jeff David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 14:14, Dan Winship wrote: No, I think you were right originally. "Whenever possible" should try both 993 and STARTTLS, but allow both to fail. There's no reason why someone would want to

Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
David Woodhouse wrote: On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: right, hence the way it is done now. Which is sane enough -- it's just that the nomenclature is currently somewhat misleading. *nod* There _may_ be people who want '993 or 143+TLS or

RE: [Evolution] RFC2342: Namespace

2003-07-22 Thread Matthew Keller
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:03, Dan Winship wrote: I guess it IS open to interpretation. I interpret both the RFC and the FAQ answer as saying This is how mail is stored on the server, but compliant clients don't have to display the hierarchy that way. The FAQ probably does say that, but

[Evolution] working offline / subfolders are headers only / IMAP

2003-07-22 Thread Owen Barder
I need to work offline, so that I can process emails, and then resynchronise when I next have an internet connection. I am using an IMAP server, in the hope of having a single master mail store. Evolution works as I would expect for the top level INBOX folder; but for any mails in a subfolder

Re: [Evolution] working offline / subfolders are headers only / IMAP

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
In the settings, you can configure which folders are to be synced to disk when going offline. Hope that helps, Jeff Owen Barder wrote: I need to work offline, so that I can process emails, and then resynchronise when I next have an internet connection. I am using an IMAP server, in the hope

Re: [Evolution] Contacts runs like treacle

2003-07-22 Thread Matthew Whimp
I've fixed it! (sort of). I've changed the view to phone list (from address card), and it scrolls like it should, I can select stuff without it bogging. The initial load time is non-existant. Ahhh bliss again. Carry on. Hope this helps those having the same problem as me. Matt On Tue,

[Evolution] Evo 1.4.3: fonts for menus, folders etc.

2003-07-22 Thread Itzchak Rehberg
I just had to install a complete new system (SuSE 8.2) and installed Evo 1.4.3 via red-carpet. Now it uses far too big fonts for menus, lists and the icon-bar left-hand. I tried to change that via gnomecc (I run KDE 3.1) with no effect, the mail settings had no effect either. The FAQ describes

Re: [Evolution] Filters

2003-07-22 Thread Aaron Weber
Armin: If you select, in the account settings, Apply filters to incoming messages for this account then the filters will work automatically. Otherwise, Ctrl-A Ctrl-Y filters. Yours, Aaron Weber Ximian, Inc. On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:10, Armin Bauer wrote: Hi, just wanted to know if the

Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.4.3: fonts for menus, folders etc.

2003-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
those font settings are only for gtkhtml anyway, not for gtk fonts (for stuff in menus etc). You need to run the GNOME 2 settings program which I believe is no longer called gnomecc, but rather control-center or some such. Itzchak Rehberg wrote: I just had to install a complete new system

[Evolution] How do I print my Contacts?

2003-07-22 Thread Earl Bills
1. How do I print multiple contacts? If I highlight several contacts, right click, and select Print from the pop-up menu, Evolution only prints the last contact of those highlighted. This behavior is the same regardless of whether I send the output to the printer, to a .ps file, or to a .pdf file.

[Evolution] How does evolution determine the browser to use when a link isclicked?

2003-07-22 Thread Michael Fabbri
How does evolution choose a browser, or is it necessary to change my default browser some where else in the system. I am running RH 9. ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Contacts runs like treacle

2003-07-22 Thread Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper
I'm running 1.4.3 (evolution-1.4.3-0.ximian.6.1). On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 17:53, Chris Toshok wrote: Hm, that's really strange. The minicard view does have a lot of performance issues but I worked to eliminate a few of them (the fact that it generates a full relayout whenever you insert a card

Re: [Evolution] How does evolution determine the browser to usewhen a link is clicked?

2003-07-22 Thread Itzchak Rehberg
How does evolution choose a browser, or is it necessary to change my default browser some where else in the system. I am running RH 9. For 1.3 and newer: it uses the browser selected through the gnome-default-applications-properties program (available in XD2 from System - Personal

[Evolution] we were unable to open this addressbook with 1.4

2003-07-22 Thread Mr. Mailing List
I've had 1.4 for some time now, and recently changed my main user's name to david. i changed all the perms and stuff to be under david, but i can no longer access my evolution contacts, even though i can clearly see them in /home/david/evolution/local/Contacts/addressbook.db -rw-rw-r--1

[Evolution] Use Evolution as default mailer from Mozilla

2003-07-22 Thread Wouter van Marle
Hi All, Is there any way that when clicking an e-mail address link in Mozilla, that Evolution is started to send that e-mail for me? Normally Mozilla wants to use it's own mailer, which I have not configured. -- Wouter van Marle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Squirrel Systems HK