On Wed, 2005-17-08 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for
example) ...
What's the prognosis on that, Michael? Is that in the release critical
category, or a yeah, whatever. We'll get to it eventually.
[As you'll recall, the offline
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:44 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Wed, 2005-17-08 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for
example) ...
What's the prognosis on that, Michael? Is that in the release critical
category, or a yeah, whatever.
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that
I installed 2.3.7 an hour ago and seem to be seeing a dramatic
improvement in startup speed for my (large) IMAP mailboxes. Evo was
always very noticeably slower
the imap code was recently changed to delay scanning the folder for
changes rather than doing it right at open time which makes it appear
faster.
Jeff
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that
I
No it shouldn't be your imagination, it should be noticably faster for
most users.
Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for
example) ... but the code was re-done to remove a badly thought-out
implementation that seemed the right way to go at the time. And some
locking
Excellent. I don't care about offline usage so this is a big net win for
me (pun intended :-).
poc
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
No it shouldn't be your imagination, it should be noticably faster for
most users.
Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit
Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that
I installed 2.3.7 an hour ago and seem to be seeing a dramatic
improvement in startup speed for my (large) IMAP mailboxes. Evo was
always very noticeably slower than TBird but that gap has closed
significantly or disappeared
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 10:00 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:42 +0200, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I switched to IMAP as you suggested but I had initially switched to
IMAP4rev1
since there is a folder that I like to see but therefore I have to
change the
I was considering proposing to remove it as well.
Jeff
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:25 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Which imap implementation are you using? imap4rev1 is newer but
less
Hi there,
after more than five years of disconnection to that list I will start to
bother you again with some questions ;-)
First of all: how active is the development of evolution now?
It seems to me that there is a bit the kick left over the years and
since Novell aquired Ximian
there are a
I'm not sure what provider type you've been using (the Server Type menu
in the account editor), but you probably want to be using IMAP and not
IMAP4rev1. That may solve your crash problems...
The IMAP4rev1 plugin is what I was working on before I left the team to
try and write a cleaner
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 14:47 +0200, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Hi there,
after more than five years of disconnection to that list I will start to
bother you again with some questions ;-)
First of all: how active is the development of evolution now?
Absolutely flat-out - like it has been for the
Hi Jeffrey,
I switched to IMAP as you suggested but I had initially switched to
IMAP4rev1
since there is a folder that I like to see but therefore I have to
change the namespace.
If I do that I can see that folder but evolution says that it cannot see
the folders under INBOX anymore
If I use
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:42 +0200, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I switched to IMAP as you suggested but I had initially switched to
IMAP4rev1
since there is a folder that I like to see but therefore I have to
change the namespace.
If I do that I can see that folder but evolution says
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:42 +0200, Thomas Emmel wrote:
Hi Jeffrey,
I switched to IMAP as you suggested but I had initially switched to
IMAP4rev1
since there is a folder that I like to see but therefore I have to
change the namespace.
If I do that I can see that folder but evolution says
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Which imap implementation are you using? imap4rev1 is newer but
less
battle hardened and thus buggier than the imap one. I never get
crashes with it (where 'never' is defined as not enough to notice or
recall), although I only use it for one
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Which imap implementation are you using? imap4rev1 is newer but
less
battle hardened and thus buggier than the imap one. I never get
crashes with it (where 'never' is defined
hi jeffrey,
Am Freitag, den 20.05.2005, 22:23 -0600 schrieb Jeffrey D. Means:
I have setup filters but when in coming mail hits my imap account the
filters are not processed, is this the expected action?
make sure you have enabled Apply filters to new messages under Tools
| Settings | Email
I use Evolution with an IMAP account. There is one small annoyance:
whenever I download new messages from the IMAP server and read them, it
seems Evolution does not let the server know that the e-mails have been
downloaded and read. The new mail applet in the GNOME panel keeps
spinning happily
The only workaround is the one you've discovered - to change folders.
There is another notification applet, using d-bus which can be used to find out about new mails. Its been posted to the evolution-patches list at least.
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 10:53 +0200, Martijn Anthonissen wrote:
I
Hi!
Playing with another program that interacts with my IMAP server I
manage to erase my 60 Mb worth of stored mail. I have seen that
evolution keeps a local copy for offline browsing of all the mail in
the IMAP server, so I was trying to recover my mail from the local
copy and put it back in the
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:58 +0100, Nacho Más wrote:
Hi!
Playing with another program that interacts with my IMAP server I
manage to erase my 60 Mb worth of stored mail. I have seen that
Or, you could restore them from backup? You make backups, don't
you?
--
My backup in the laptop is the local copy of the IMAP account, sure,
but I can't read it back into evolution... and the server must have
backups... I have asked the sysadmins to restore the mail, but that is
out of my hands and I don't really like that. I'd like to be able to
restore the content
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000146.html
hopefully you find that util useful...
Jeff
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 15:32 +0100, Nacho Más wrote:
My backup in the laptop is the local copy of the IMAP account, sure,
but I can't read it back into evolution... and the server must
That was exactly what I was looking for! Thanks very much!
/Nacho
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 09:54:46 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000146.html
hopefully you find that util useful...
Jeff
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 15:32
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 15:32 +0100, Nacho Más wrote:
My backup in the laptop is the local copy of the IMAP account, sure,
And if no one had such a utility that fejj had described, your
backup solution wouldn't be worth spit.
--
-
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:54 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
http://codeblogs.ximian.com/blogs/evolution/archives/000146.html
hopefully you find that util useful...
It's darned useful. I'll be able to recover some old emails that
I'd written off as unrecoverable.
--
sorry fejj - meant to send to list
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 16:20 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
all of these issues have already been resolved in CVS if you use the
experimental IMAP4rev1 plugin rather than the IMAP plugin.
OK - well I located and downloaded the evolution tarball but I
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 07:35 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
I suspect the message has NUL characters in it?
This string is coming from the server, as it doesn't exist anywhere in
Evolution, and evolution can handle binary data anyway. Strictly
speaking, imap doesn't allow unencoded NUL characters
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 15:53 -0800, Tom Duffy wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 07:35 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
I suspect the message has NUL characters in it?
This string is coming from the server, as it doesn't exist anywhere in
Evolution, and evolution can handle binary data anyway.
Yes, the mail server is, I believe, broken. It doesn't seem to send a
'BYE' before it disconnects, which is required by the IMAP spec. All
the same, I believe evolution is equally broken since it informs me that
the IMAP server is funky 18 times per day, which is entirely unhelpful.
It would be
all of these issues have already been resolved in CVS if you use the
experimental IMAP4rev1 plugin rather than the IMAP plugin.
Jeff
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 14:23 -0700, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 14:13 -0700, John Schmidt wrote:
Jay Kreps wrote:
Right, but put yourself in
Hello all
I am accessing a IMAPS MS Exchange server from home, but I can only see
the INBOX folder. I have tried to override the namespace, with no
success.
Does anyone have pointers to see my subfolders?
Thanks a lot
Fred
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
check that you haven't set 'see only subscribed folder' or have it set and have subscribed to the folders.
also note that changing that setting requires a restart of evolution for it to take effect.
also, sometimes you need a funny namespace like '%' to work-around server bugs.
On Mon,
A few days ago, I started receiving this message every time evolution
refreshes my IMAP inbox (every 10 minutes). I seem to be able to access
everything and all is working as normal I think, but I have keep closing
this dialog...
Error while Fetching Mail.
IMAP command failed: Message contains
I suspect the message has NUL characters in it?
This string is coming from the server, as it doesn't exist anywhere in Evolution, and evolution can handle binary data anyway. Strictly speaking, imap doesn't allow unencoded NUL characters (0x00) in messages, so its probably the server just
Hello all
I am accessing a IMAPS MS Exchange server from home, but I can only see
the INBOX folder. I have tried to override the namespace, with no
success.
Does anyone have pointers to see my subfolders?
Thanks a lot
Fred
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
you have to restart if you change that setting, for it to take effect.
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 23:43 +0100, Fred Blaise wrote:
Hello all
I am accessing a IMAPS MS Exchange server from home, but I can only see
the INBOX folder. I have tried to override the namespace, with no
success.
Does
Jay Kreps wrote:
Right, but put yourself in the position of the user. One email client
produces irritating and useless error messages at regular intervals,
whereas all others work fine. I doubt any reasonable person would
conclude that it was the server that was broken; they would probably
just
On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 14:13 -0700, John Schmidt wrote:
Jay Kreps wrote:
Right, but put yourself in the position of the user. One email client
produces irritating and useless error messages at regular intervals,
whereas all others work fine. I doubt any reasonable person would
conclude
the IMAP spec also guarentees that the server will not disconnect the
client until at LEAST 30 minutes of inactivity
so 10 minutes == broken server
and if it really is disconnecting after 10 minutes no matter what (even
if there is activity), then that just means the server is even more
broken.
Right, but put yourself in the position of the user. One email client
produces irritating and useless error messages at regular intervals,
whereas all others work fine. I doubt any reasonable person would
conclude that it was the server that was broken; they would probably
just use a different
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 10:27 +0800, Gideon N. Guillen wrote:
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:43:32 -0800, Jay Kreps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is an excellent suggestion, but unfortunately that was the first
thing I tried. The server disconnects after ~10 minutes regardless of
whether or
You could make your own patch which just surpressed displaying of that message. But then some operations would fail silently, and you might want to know they failed, which is why we don't do it normally.
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:32 -0800, Jay Kreps wrote:
Right, but put yourself in the
I get my email through a university email system via IMAP. Their imap
servers unfortunately disconnect users after about 10 minutes,
presumably to save wear and tear on the servers or perhaps just to be
irritating. Every time this happens, Evolution produces a pop-up
message:
Error while
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 10:43 -0800, Jay Kreps wrote:
That is an excellent suggestion, but unfortunately that was the first
thing I tried. The server disconnects after ~10 minutes regardless of
whether or not you are idle. Thus changing the mail checking interval
doesn't have any effect.
It
ok. I have a log of this happening, but its very big (9.2mb) - who
should I send it to? Should I file a bug? (i've never been quite clear
on what you developers prefer from users as far as when to put something
in bugzilla, i.e. should we post to the mailing list to make sure its
actually a
I mean this totally non-rhetorically: am I the first person to ever use
evolution+IMAP+cyrus? It would seem to me that this would have been
reported before if it was happening to everyone with this combination of
software, as cyrus seems to be a pretty widely deployed server... though
I
Also, I'm not sure if its a related problem, but I'm also seeing my (non
spam) filters occasionally not get processed - though right clicking and
selecting apply filters makes it work, so its not a failure to match the
filter term, but the filter not getting applied. This only happens
ok. I have a log of this happening, but its very big (9.2mb) - who
should I send it to? Should I file a bug? (i've never been quite clear
on what you developers prefer from users as far as when to put something
in bugzilla, i.e. should we post to the mailing list to make sure its
actually a bug
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 12:31 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
ok. I have a log of this happening, but its very big (9.2mb) - who
You've rzipped it, right?
should I send it to? Should I file a bug? (i've never been quite clear
on what you developers prefer from users as far as when to put something
and
selecting apply filters makes it work, so its not a failure to match the
filter term, but the filter not getting applied. This only happens
occasionally.
I mean this totally non-rhetorically: am I the first person to ever use
evolution+IMAP+cyrus? It would seem to me that this would have been
reported
Hello all,
via google, I've seen various bits and pieces of discussion about
problems with evolution's spam filtering when used on an imap account...
however the problem I'm having seems to be somewhat different from what
has been described before. What I'm seeing is when I mark messages as
Its what comes packaged with fedora core 3. Was this a known issue which
has been fixed in current builds?
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:18 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Hello all,
via google, I've seen various bits and pieces of discussion about
problems with evolution's spam
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:18 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Hello all,
via google, I've seen various bits and pieces of discussion about
problems with evolution's spam filtering when used on an imap account...
however the problem I'm having seems to be somewhat different from what
has been
Oh... typo, sorry bout that.
Dan Stromberg wrote:
It's probably 2.0.2 then.
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:48 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Its what comes packaged with fedora core 3. Was this a known issue which
has been fixed in current builds?
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:18
It's probably 2.0.2 then.
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:48 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Its what comes packaged with fedora core 3. Was this a known issue which
has been fixed in current builds?
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:18 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Hello all,
via
Is there a relatively simple way for me to look into this? I
unfortuantely don't have access to my orgs imap server logs... I
remember back in 1.x days there was a way to get evolution to log its
imap transactions - does this still exist?
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
hard to know for certain, but
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 14:38 -0800, Kevin Bowen wrote:
Is there a relatively simple way for me to look into this? I
unfortuantely don't have access to my orgs imap server logs... I
remember back in 1.x days there was a way to get evolution to log its
imap transactions - does this still
hard to know for certain, but perhaps your IMAP server is changing
UIDVALIDITY? if that chanegs, we have to throw away all the locally
cached flags (of which the spam flag is one) and refetch all the info's
again.
this might not be the problem, but it's the only thing I can think of.
or perhaps
Hi,
with evolution it's not possible to browse folders of other users which
are readable me.
Within the folder list only my own folders are listed.. What do i do wrong?
every help is welcome
so long
Michael Rietz
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 17:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
I use IMAP exclusively over 4 or 5 accounts and the filters work fine.
I only have to apply them manually (i.e. do Ctrl-A, Ctrl-Y) if I've
accessed the mail from elsewhere - for instance, I run Evo at home as
well, but some of the filters I
On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 00:13, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:38 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:56, John Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 04:31, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:34, John Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
I use IMAP exclusively over 4
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:34, John Schmidt wrote:
I just switched to IMAP and filters aren't automatically working.
Should I have to manually execute Apply Filters on new messages in
my Inbox?
I've re-created a couple of filters and I've turned on the Apply
filters to new messages in
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 11:31 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:34, John Schmidt wrote:
I just switched to IMAP and filters aren't automatically working.
Should I have to manually execute Apply Filters on new messages in
my Inbox?
I've re-created a couple of filters
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 04:31, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:34, John Schmidt wrote:
I just switched to IMAP and filters aren't automatically working.
Should I have to manually execute Apply Filters on new messages in
my Inbox?
I've re-created a couple of filters and I've
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:56, John Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 04:31, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:34, John Schmidt wrote:
I just switched to IMAP and filters aren't automatically working.
Should I have to manually execute Apply Filters on new messages in
my
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 16:38 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 15:56, John Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-29 at 04:31, Pete Biggs wrote:
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:34, John Schmidt wrote:
[snip]
I use IMAP exclusively over 4 or 5 accounts and the filters work fine.
I only have
I just switched to IMAP and filters aren't automatically working. Should I have to manually execute Apply Filters on new messages in my Inbox?
I've re-created a couple of filters and I've turned on the Apply filters to new messages in INBOX on this server option. I thought that combination
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 12:27 +0800, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 16:47 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Evolution only transfers the new data required too, but the actual
transfer speed suffers a lot if you have any latency in the link.
Is there anything that can be done around this? Is
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 16:47 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Evolution only transfers the new data required too, but the actual
transfer speed suffers a lot if you have any latency in the link.
Is there anything that can be done around this? Is it a handshake
protocols suffer from lag, duh thing, or is it
hi,
i am using evolution-1.5.93.
when i create an imap account i have an option to:
Automatically synchronize remote mail locally.
and also when i right click an imap folder,
i have an option to:
Copy folder content locally for offline operation
i am confused..what those option do EXACTLY?
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 16:47 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:14 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
hi,
when i create an imap account i have an option to:
Automatically synchronize remote mail locally.
and also when i right click an imap folder,
i have an option to:
Copy
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 11:35 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 16:47 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:14 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
hi,
when i create an imap account i have an option to:
Automatically synchronize remote mail locally.
and also when i
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 20:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 11:35 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 16:47 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:14 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
hi,
unfortunately it does not seem to be like that.
i tried the
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 15:39 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 20:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 11:35 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 16:47 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 10:14 +0200, Gbor Farkas wrote:
hi,
Hi,
I am considering replacing Outlook on our network (approximately 100
clients) with evolution.
However, i have a number of questions regarding the central management
of Evolution IMAP and POP3 account data for each user in a network:
1. The windows logon provides a single sign on for both
the central management
of Evolution IMAP and POP3 account data for each user in a network:
1. The windows logon provides a single sign on for both windows and
outlook. Meaning that when a user changes his/her password in windows
this is automatic for outlook too. Is it possible to achieve a similar
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 16:53 +0200, nick galea wrote:
Hi,
I am considering replacing Outlook on our network (approximately 100
clients) with evolution.
However, i have a number of questions regarding the central management
of Evolution IMAP and POP3 account data for each user in a network
Hello,
Ive got a a small problem with IMAP/Kerberos
and GSSAPI/Evolution. I want to authenticate against a Kerberos KDC. The
problem is that evolution uses the wrong principal name.
Log snip:
I have been using pop for my mail but would prefer to use imap. I have
tried setting up a new account and also switching my pop account to imap
and it is not grabbing the new messages either way. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Paonia
___
evolution maillist -
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:33 -0400, Paonia Ezrine-N'Shaiha wrote:
I have been using pop for my mail but would prefer to use imap. I have
tried setting up a new account and also switching my pop account to imap
and it is not grabbing the new messages either way. Any ideas?
Are you sure this is
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:46, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:33 -0400, Paonia Ezrine-N'Shaiha wrote:
I have been using pop for my mail but would prefer to use imap. I have
tried setting up a new account and also switching my pop account to imap
and it is not grabbing the new
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 15:00 -0400, Paonia wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:46, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 14:33 -0400, Paonia Ezrine-N'Shaiha wrote:
I have been using pop for my mail but would prefer to use imap. I have
tried setting up a new account and also switching my pop
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 16:50 -0400, Wise, Jeremey wrote:
In the job I have I work as a consultant who watches a 'queue' which is
an email box. A request for a design or help will come into the Exchange
mailbox and I (or any number of other consultants) will review the
request then pull it into
In the job I have I work as a consultant who watches a 'queue' which is
an email box. A request for a design or help will come into the Exchange
mailbox and I (or any number of other consultants) will review the
request then pull it into our personal mailbox to work on it. I just
found out that
In the job I have I work as a consultant who watches a 'queue' which is
an email box. A request for a design or help will come into the Exchange
mailbox and I (or any number of other consultants) will review the
request then pull it into our personal mailbox to work on it. I just
found out
I'm connecting to a UW IMAP server and have my mail in my ~/mail
directory on the server. When using most imap clients, I set the mail
folder to mail and the client shows all my folders correctly at the
'root' level of my mail account, alongside my Inbox.
In evolution, however, even after
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 23:24 -0400, Paul Galbraith wrote:
I'm connecting to a UW IMAP server and have my mail in my ~/mail
directory on the server. When using most imap clients, I set the mail
folder to mail and the client shows all my folders correctly at the
'root' level of my mail
Hi all,
how can i get evolution to upload a mail on sending to the sent folder
on my imap account? thunderbird does this very nice
--
Benjamin Schulz
tel: +49 (7643) 933 69 13
fax: +49 (7643) 933 69 14
gsm: +49 (178) 322 85 82
web: http://benjamin.schulz.name/
gpg: D1EBE448
signature.asc
err, configure it to?
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 13:34 +0200, Benjamin Schulz wrote:
Hi all,
how can i get evolution to upload a mail on sending to the sent folder
on my imap account? thunderbird does this very nice
--
Benjamin Schulz
tel: +49 (7643) 933 69 13
fax: +49 (7643) 933 69 14
gsm:
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 12:52, Not Zed wrote:
err, configure it to?
:-)
/me takes pity..
For evolution 1.4.x:-
Tools - Settings
Pick Mail Accounts, select account you use for sending Edit
In Evolution Account Editor window select Defaults tab. There you
will see a section Sent and Draft
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 23:53 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 10:50 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
Hi,
With
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:43 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 23:53 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 10:50 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:43 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 23:53 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 10:50 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 03:25 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 14:43 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 23:53 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 10:46 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 04:36, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
When I delete an email that's sitting in one of my folders, where
is it supposed to go?
haggis imap/INBOX/Trash
or
haggis imap/Trash ??
It should only go to
Hi,
With IMAP, in the 1.4 series, deleting an email would send haggis
imap/Trash (which has a trash can icon next to it), where I could
do Action-Empty Trash to get rid of it.
Now, deleted emails go to haggis imap/INBOX/Trash, which I have to
then explicitly Delete, which sends them to haggis
Hallelujah! It sounds like they've given us a real Trash folder in
1.5.x. I'm delighted to hear it, and look forward to trying it, because
I hate the way it works in 1.4.x. I would hope, though, for the sake of
making everyone happy, that it's just an option in account setup, like
Draft and
Well shucks, Ron. Your message got me excited so I finally decided
there was reason enough to try the Evolution development version... but
my trash is going into the old vFolder, like it always does. My
INBOX/Trash folder is only used by my webmail and other clients.
Sigh.
I first looked for
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
