tor, 01.04.2004 kl. 03.08 skrev guenther:
Tony, please accept my apology.
As I already mentioned previously, I got to know you with a different
attitude -- not to rant about topics [1] you aren't highly familiar
with, but to actually know what you are talking about.
I answered your
So I look in the Junk Folder and I see 700 Messages.. They are all
there...
*sigh* That's what I intended to ask as I read the previous mails.
That's *cool* SpamAssassin run wild and out of control. And never a
mention of how to configure it. Let alone update it.
Another reason for
Let's not be hasty and switch back to Mozilla. What we should do is
note Evolution thinks this is Junk mail. If it is, click this button:
and when they do, ask the user if they want to turn on junk mail
filtering.
OR, at first-run and during migration, *ask* the user: Evolution 2.0
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 12.16 skrev guenther:
[...]
The thing is, Mozilla is using pure Bayes (AFAIK) and Evo is using
SpamAssassin of unknown (to me) heritage (uses Bayes, but SA has a lot
more besides). My present version is 2.63 and I can do one heck of a lot
to make it work better for my
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 12.07 skrev guenther:
Another reason for being a stick-in-the-mud and keeping to Evo 1.4,
whilst keeping SA (what version was it again?) on the Postfix snapshot
smtp amavisd-new proxy MTA. *Where it belongs*. And yes, we have
LDAP-based amavisd-new per-user
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 07:10, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 12.07 skrev guenther:
[...]
You can entirely disabling filtering through SpamAssassin in Evolution.
No one is forced to. IMHO it is a better approach in UN*X land to use
applications, that already exist and proved to work
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 08:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 07:10, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 12.07 skrev guenther:
[...]
You can entirely disabling filtering through SpamAssassin in Evolution.
No one is forced to. IMHO it is a better approach in UN*X land
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:28, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass
of users who demanded this feature. So, this is pretty much moot.
But I thought Evolution 1.5.x/2.x just gave you a front-end to sa-learn?
In which case Evolution isn't
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:48, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:28, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass
of users who demanded this feature. So, this is pretty much moot.
But I thought Evolution 1.5.x/2.x just gave you
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:48, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:28, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass
of users who demanded this feature. So, this is pretty
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 02:16 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
The thing is, Mozilla is using pure Bayes (AFAIK) and Evo is using
SpamAssassin of unknown (to me) heritage (uses Bayes, but SA has a lot
more besides). My present version is 2.63 and I can do one heck of a lot
to make it work better for
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:12 +0100, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:48, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:28, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 16:12 +0100, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:54, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:48, D. D. Brierton wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 15:28, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 16.28 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
I think you've misunderstood Guenther. He's not slamming Bayesian
filters, he's saying there's no need to implement one in the
mail client when there are several standalone implementations
out there.
while the mailer hackers agree with
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:53 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 17.25 skrev Rick DeNatale:
After some head scratching, it actually looks like Evo 1.5 works very
nicely with my installation of SA.
Brilliant! That was what I was waiting for. Don't think much of the
Procmail
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:53 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 17.25 skrev Rick DeNatale:
After some head scratching, it actually looks like Evo 1.5 works very
nicely with my installation of SA.
Brilliant! That was what I was waiting for. Don't think much of the
Procmail
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:53, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 17.25 skrev Rick DeNatale:
After some head scratching, it actually looks like Evo 1.5 works very
nicely with my installation of SA.
Brilliant! That was what I was waiting for. Don't think much of the
Procmail bit,
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 23:39 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
Ok, please open a bug on bugzilla.ximian.com.
Run evolution with CAMEL_DEBUG=all (if you're running latest latest cvs
only, or use CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1) set in the environment. It will
print a load of debug stuff to stdio/stderr. Record
tir, 30.03.2004 kl. 18.36 skrev Charles:
camel_junk_plugin_check_junk
em_junk_sa_check_junk
pipe_to_sa spamc -c -p 7830
junk filter = *JUNK*
camel_junk_plugin_check_junk
em_junk_sa_check_junk
pipe_to_sa spamc -c -p 7830
junk filter = *JUNK*
Running the command found the above...
So
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:52 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
[snip]
That's *cool* SpamAssassin run wild and out of control. And never a
mention of how to configure it. Let alone update it.
Another reason for being a stick-in-the-mud and keeping to Evo 1.4,
whilst keeping SA (what version was it
Let's not be hasty and switch back to Mozilla. What we should do is note Evolution thinks this is Junk mail. If it is, click this button: and when they do, ask the user if they want to turn on junk mail filtering.
OR, at first-run and during migration, *ask* the user: Evolution 2.0 includes
ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 00.29 skrev Aaron Weber:
Let's not be hasty and switch back to Mozilla. What we should do is
note Evolution thinks this is Junk mail. If it is, click this button:
and when they do, ask the user if they want to turn on junk mail
filtering.
OR, at first-run and during
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
The thing is, Mozilla is using pure Bayes (AFAIK) and Evo is using
SpamAssassin of unknown (to me) heritage (uses Bayes, but SA has a lot
more besides). My present version is 2.63 and I can do one heck of a lot
to make it work better for my site than Evo can.
I agree that one
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 20:15, Ricky wrote:
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
The thing is, Mozilla is using pure Bayes (AFAIK) and Evo is using
SpamAssassin of unknown (to me) heritage (uses Bayes, but SA has a lot
more besides). My present version is 2.63 and I can do one heck of a lot
to make it work
Yes, please -- something like what Aaron Weber mentions below. I run a
server-side package (dspam), the last thing I need is an upgraded Evo
starting to also do spam filtering by accident because I didn't
notice...
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 14:29, Aaron Weber wrote:
Let's not be hasty and
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 18:47 -0800, Al Hooton wrote:
Yes, please -- something like what Aaron Weber mentions below. I run a
server-side package (dspam), the last thing I need is an upgraded Evo
starting to also do spam filtering by accident because I didn't
notice...
Perhaps adding a
26 matches
Mail list logo
