Le mar 31/12/2002 à 10:25, Calvin Liu a écrit :
i gave the configure option --with-krb5=my lib dir but the configure
result still reported Kerberos 4/5: no/no.
is there any option as --enable-... relate to this?
You should use --with-krb5=%{_prefix} --with-krb4=%{_prefix} where
Hi,
thanks for pointing that out. I have a slightly simpler fix to apply.
html_engine_get_table should not return e-cursor-object and there
should not be two Table menu entries in popup menu.
Cheers
Radek
On t, 2003-01-02 at 03:18, Yuedong Du wrote:
Just resend this mail, it seems that
On Sun, 2002-12-22 at 05:15, Antonio Xu wrote:
Now, evolution has implemented the function which is synchronize
some specific folders for using as offline. But the function was not
very flexible for uesr. If user want to sync a folder, he must set the
offline folder at the first,then
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 05:11, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
Yo!
I'm a bit disappointed by Evo 1.2.x - I've heard rumour that it now
fixes all known GPG related bugs. Dropping inline support is imho not a
fix, but I can understand it.
it is the only fix that can be done. no
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:32, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
[snip]
Here are the cases I've had recently:
- I can't verify messages I've sent myself when the attachment is a
rfc822-message (what's that MIME type again? You know what I mean).
(evo 1.2.1, gpg 1.2.1)
I'll look into this, but
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:37, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:32, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
[snip]
Here are the cases I've had recently:
- I can't verify messages I've sent myself when the attachment is a
rfc822-message (what's that MIME type again? You know what I mean).
Would you please attach them to bugzilla anyway? I want to be 100% sure
that I am looking at the raw message sources as they are in your mbox
file(s).
Thanks.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:59, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:37, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:12, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
[snip]
I don't care which rfc is followed. 2015 or 3156, all I see is that
evolution is quite often not verifying signatures, and when I ask, all
of the others (except fellow evolution victims) can verify the
signature.
Hi,
I use a dutch system so i will try to use the correct syntax.
In the main screen summary you have the weather and news, at work
without a proxy everything works fine, but at home where i must use
proxy setting for my ISP i get errors is there a way to get it work at
home also ?
Thank you
--
Hi Not Zed
I tried it and it did nothing. No errors. Here is what I tried
[Jim@localhost Jim]$ gnome-moz-remote http://www.ximian.com
[Jim@localhost Jim]$ gnome-moz-remote
[Jim@localhost Jim]$ su - root
Password:
[root@localhost root]# gnome-moz-remote http://www.ximian.com
[root@localhost
cheers();
I tried it and it did nothing. No errors. Here is what I tried
[Jim@localhost Jim]$ gnome-moz-remote http://www.ximian.com
[Jim@localhost Jim]$ gnome-moz-remote
[Jim@localhost Jim]$ su - root
Password:
[root@localhost root]# gnome-moz-remote http://www.ximian.com
Hi
I was using Galeon 1.2.6 as default browser when clicking a link in
Evolution. Now my Galeon has crashed (last Moz doesn't like Galeon) and
I want to go back to Mozilla, but I can't remember how I told to
Evolution to open this or that browser. Anyone know how?
--
Massimiliano Bini [EMAIL
cheers();
That's getting an FAQ. Can anyone add it to the FAQ list?
I was using Galeon 1.2.6 as default browser when clicking a link in
Evolution. Now my Galeon has crashed (last Moz doesn't like Galeon) and
I want to go back to Mozilla, but I can't remember how I told to
Evolution to open
Il gio, 2003-01-02 alle 14:44, guenther ha scritto:
cheers();
That's getting an FAQ. Can anyone add it to the FAQ list?
I was using Galeon 1.2.6 as default browser when clicking a link in
Evolution. Now my Galeon has crashed (last Moz doesn't like Galeon) and
I want to go back to
cheers();
Hey, you're right :-) thank you very much.
NP.
Also make sure, the mozilla binary is in your path. Sounds like you
installed mozilla 1.2.1 from mozilla.org. What does 'which mozilla' say?
If no mozilla is found, make a symlink like:
% ln -s /usr/local/mozilla/mozilla
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use
GPG to sign my emails. I'd like to be able to sign them and have a user
with a windows machine and PGP be able to verify the signature.
Il gio, 2003-01-02 alle 15:20, guenther ha scritto:
Mozilla 1.2.1 from mozilla.org. It's working fine, the only missing
thing was to be called correctly from Evolution.
AFAIK you will run in trouble, if you put mozilla in the .gnome/Gnome
file. Clicking on an URL when mozilla is
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use
GPG to sign my emails. I'd like to be able to sign them and have a user
with a
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like to solve, though. I use
GPG to sign my emails. I'd
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:16, Jason Frisvold wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 10:03, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:26, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Greetings,
I've been using Evolution for a short time now and it seems to be a
great product. I have a problem I would like
cheers();
Mozilla 1.2.1 from mozilla.org. It's working fine, the only missing
thing was to be called correctly from Evolution.
AFAIK you will run in trouble, if you put mozilla in the .gnome/Gnome
file. Clicking on an URL when mozilla is already running will get you to
choose an
Hi,
02-01-2003, 00:31, Not Zed:
After installing 1.2.1 new I noticed new problem:
- I have several mail accounts and when I check them using
send/receive password dialogs are too narrow - it
may sound like a joke but this is serious - I don't
see the whole account name
Il gio, 2003-01-02 alle 16:53, guenther ha scritto:
That's the main reason for which before I wanted to use Galeon instead
than Moz. BUT: last Moz version (1.2.1, but 1.2b too) looks like has
solved this problem: if you run 'mozilla' when another mozilla instance
is running, another window
cheers();
But there still is a reason for a helping caller program: I have a small
perl script, so I get no new window but a new tab, when mozilla is
already running. :)
I've tried to make something similar but I'm pretty noobs to perl. I've
found how to send the new URL to another a
cheers( again );
Of course, it's attached.
(Don't ask me about those parameters please, I stripped off all not
necessary from a python script, floating around some time.)
You have to change the line in .gnome/Gnome accordingly, so that script
is executed.
I didn't have time to check the archives thoroughly but I'm somewhat
surprised nobody has put a Bayesian spam filter or something like that
into Evolution. I'd kill for that. I'd do it myself if I had the time,
but I really don't.
Anyway, in case this spurs someone to do some work, I did spend
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 00:58, Not Zed wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 05:20, Ibraheem Umaru-Mohammed wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to set read messages as hidden by default? I get tired of
changing folders and when returning, the first thing i do is hide the
read messages.
It should
Hi, is it possible to change spell-checkers on the fly in evolution?
This would be SUPER helpful, for those of us who work in multi-lingual
environments, eliminating the need to compose emails in a word processor
and cut paste. This would be a true benefit for work environments
that can further
Hello,
I mentioned my problem a few weeks ago (I can not open my attachments
,such as postscript files,with an external application like gv)
Even a clean .gnome tar which worked in another environment (thanks
John) didnt solve my problem
Does anybody know which file to edit and what the entry
cheers();
Hi, is it possible to change spell-checkers on the fly in evolution?
This would be SUPER helpful, for those of us who work in multi-lingual
environments, eliminating the need to compose emails in a word processor
and cut paste. This would be a true benefit for work environments
Kirk Strauser wrote:
-
...
include /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/evolutionperson.schema
...
-
on RH72 this was found at /usr/share/evolution/evolutionperson.schema, or a
quick:
locate evolutionperson.schema
will find it.
-
Noticed too that Categories is
How do you enable the languages? And how does it work having both
languages enabled at the same time. If I write a word in either
language in the same email it will recognize it? That would be cool.
A language menu the Format menu would be great, they don't have to be
non-exclusive, as you
cheers();
How do you enable the languages? And how does it work having both
languages enabled at the same time. If I write a word in either
language in the same email it will recognize it? That would be cool.
A language menu the Format menu would be great, they don't have to be
I thought about what JF had said, and did a quick test of my own. I sent
a test message from another account, using Kmail, to this account, which
uses Evolution. The results are below.
Am I to take it that this is due to the signature being inlined, rather
than attached?
-Forwarded
I don't understand what you're asking.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:18, Bill Hartwell wrote:
I thought about what JF had said, and did a quick test of my own. I sent
a test message from another account, using Kmail, to this account, which
uses Evolution. The results are below.
Am I to
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 12:39, guenther wrote:
Yes, Evolution spell-checks in all languages at the same time.
Evolution kann gleichzeitig mehrere Sprachen (wie Deutsch und Englisch)
korrigieren. Thats German and there is no error shown by Evolution.
It's correct, though... ;)
I just did a
Does Evolution not detect in-lined signatures? I would have expected to
see Evolution check 2 signatures on this email as there was the attached
one and the in-lined one...
Incidently, I cannot verify PGP signatures at all because they are
in-lined... I believe this is mentioned in the FAQ?
On
If I understand what you were saying earlier, email clients (like Kmail)
that make the signature a part of the body of the message, rather than a
separate attachment, do not understand the signatures that Evolution
sends?
I just did a personal test to see if the reverse is true as well - that
yep, your observation would be correct.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:43, Bill Hartwell wrote:
If I understand what you were saying earlier, email clients (like Kmail)
that make the signature a part of the body of the message, rather than a
separate attachment, do not understand the
Just upgraded to Evo 1.2.1 and have an operational (works with Outlook
Express) Exchange 5.5 LDAP system. I used the directory servers tool to
configure Evo to query the Ex 5.5 server. It's configured to use my
email account for authentication. I click the name of the directory and
am prompted for
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:37, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Does Evolution not detect in-lined signatures?
right, evolution doesn't support any form of inline-pgp. we only support
PGP/MIME as specificed in http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3156.txt
Jeff
I would have expected to
see Evolution check 2
On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 15:20, Massimiliano Bini wrote:
Il mer, 2003-01-01 alle 07:06, Matthew Johnson ha scritto:
Got a fix from someone else on this list (thank you, evolution is the
best GUI mail client out there imho).
check /etc/ld.so.conf and make sure /usr/lib is there and then run
Anything on the roadmap to add inline support?
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:39, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:37, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Does Evolution not detect in-lined signatures?
right, evolution doesn't support any form of inline-pgp. we only support
PGP/MIME as
not that I'm aware of. it's also one of those really irritatingly
difficult things to add support for.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:08, Jason Frisvold wrote:
Anything on the roadmap to add inline support?
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:39, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 15:37,
cheers();
mozilla.org packages typically stash shared libraries needed by
Evolution into unusual directories. Noting from another mail that you'd
installed mozilla 1.2.1 from mozilla.org, I'm willing to bet that's the
source of the problem. Mozilla packages from Ximian and from most Linux
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:44, guenther wrote:
cheers();
mozilla.org packages typically stash shared libraries needed by
Evolution into unusual directories. Noting from another mail that you'd
installed mozilla 1.2.1 from mozilla.org, I'm willing to bet that's the
source of the problem.
Its been suggested before ...
You could just use an external app, and link it in the same way the
spamassasin stuff is normally linked in.
I still think doing it at the server end is the way to go though,
otherwise you have to waste time downloading the message anyway.
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at
cheers( once_again );
mozilla.org packages typically stash shared libraries needed by
Evolution into unusual directories. Noting from another mail that you'd
installed mozilla 1.2.1 from mozilla.org, I'm willing to bet that's the
source of the problem. Mozilla packages from Ximian
cheers();
Whoa, I'm about to get lost in all that communication tonight... ;)
rpm -qf /usr/lib/libnspr4.so might tell you something, if it's still
in package management.
[root@monkey root]# rpm -qf /usr/lib/libnspr4.so
libnspr4-1.1-10mdk
Mandrake seems to make a special package for that.
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:12, Jim Frost wrote:
I note that I looked into spamassassin, which seems to be the preferred
technique using an external filter, and I really dislike its rule-based
system. Way too many false positives, and a lot of work to set up and
maintain too. Spam filtering
When will Evolution support X.509 Certificates ?
Wasn't it planned a years ago?
Federico Quagliata
--
Please use my new 0x5539D8E4 GPG key instead of my old one (0x1644D9E3)
Linux Registered User: #263663 / Machine: #160060 (Debian 3.0r1/ Woody)
On the Net: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - On the
tor, 2003-01-02 kl. 21:46 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:
yep, your observation would be correct.
I had so many complaints from Outlook people (the majority of
the great unwashed) about GPG signatures, that I've stopped using GPG.
It never did any good, anyway - I reckon it's a lost cause. Who would
The easiest answer to this question is that it will be supported when
somone implements it :-)
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 19:01, Federico Quagliata wrote:
When will Evolution support X.509 Certificates ?
Wasn't it planned a years ago?
Federico Quagliata
--
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution
and someone, at Ximian, will :)
Carlos
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 19:05, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
The easiest answer to this question is that it will be supported when
somone implements it :-)
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 19:01, Federico Quagliata wrote:
When will Evolution support X.509
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:46, Jim Frost wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:13, guenther wrote:
If you don't control the server, get your own. ;)
I do have my own for personal use. Cannot have my own for corporate
use, don't have the choice.
What, is there a corporate policy preventing you
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:48, Arthur Britto wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:12, Jim Frost wrote:
I note that I looked into spamassassin, which seems to be the preferred
technique using an external filter, and I really dislike its rule-based
system. Way too many false positives, and a lot of
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:36, Brett Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 16:46, Jim Frost wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:13, guenther wrote:
If you don't control the server, get your own. ;)
I do have my own for personal use. Cannot have my own for corporate
use, don't have the
just to get this thread to stop, since it's going no where...
Ximian is considering implementing a bayesian spam filter within
Evolution itself. Management is pushing for it to be implemented for
Evolution 1.4 but I seriously doubt Michael and I will have the time to
do it in so short an amount
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
just to get this thread to stop, since it's going no where...
Ximian is considering implementing a bayesian spam filter within
Evolution itself. Management is pushing for it to be implemented for
Evolution 1.4 but I seriously doubt Michael
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:56, Jim Frost wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 21:46, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
just to get this thread to stop, since it's going no where...
Ximian is considering implementing a bayesian spam filter within
Evolution itself. Management is pushing for it to be
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 02:43, Ibraheem Umaru-Mohammed wrote:
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 00:58, Not Zed wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-26 at 05:20, Ibraheem Umaru-Mohammed wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to set read messages as hidden by default? I get tired of
changing folders and when returning, the
Jim Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 01/02/03 at 19:07:
Of course I did. It has about a 90% success rate and more than a 1%
false positive rate and requires me to diligently keep up the rule
base. Now, 90% success would be great, but 1% false is a killer. That
means I'll see
One of the greatest evolutions feature is: virtual folder.
But since some hours, I can't define new VF or remove existing ones.
Or, better: I can add a virtual folder, or remove it. But if I close
Evolution then open it again, all my changes are lost and I get my old
VF.
--
Massimiliano Bini
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 17:42, Not Zed wrote:
Its been suggested before ...
You could just use an external app, and link it in the same way the
spamassasin stuff is normally linked in.
I still think doing it at the server end is the way to go though,
otherwise you have to waste time
Hi Guenther
Yep, mozilla is in my path, in /usr/bin/mozilla. Even stranger is that
I tried sending myself an e-mail thru K-mail with a link and guess what,
the link was clickable. I keep going back to something in the Evolution
configuration. Sure which I could figure out what. Thanks for the
Evolution simply uses the command-line that you've configured in your
GNOME 1.4 settings. These settings are stored in ~/.gnome/Gnome in the
URL Handlers section.
Jeff
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:05, Jim Macdonald wrote:
Hi Guenther
Yep, mozilla is in my path, in /usr/bin/mozilla. Even
cheers();
Its been suggested before ...
You could just use an external app, and link it in the same way the
spamassasin stuff is normally linked in.
I still think doing it at the server end is the way to go though,
otherwise you have to waste time downloading the message anyway.
cheers();
Yep, mozilla is in my path, in /usr/bin/mozilla. Even stranger is that
I tried sending myself an e-mail thru K-mail with a link and guess what,
the link was clickable. I keep going back to something in the Evolution
configuration. Sure which I could figure out what. Thanks for
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:13, guenther wrote:
If you don't control the server, get your own. ;)
I do have my own for personal use. Cannot have my own for corporate
use, don't have the choice.
I know, you mentioned spamassassin, but have you really
considered it?
Of course I did. It has
69 matches
Mail list logo
