Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-02 Thread Tony Earnshaw
man, 2002-09-02 kl. 14:56 skrev Adam Williams: > I am the sys-admin. So people should be able to access mailboxes > without authenticating to the mail server? Know what? I love people who teach me things, even put me in the wrong. That's how you learn, sometimes, not too often, by provoking. S

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-02 Thread Adam Williams
>>GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes? >No, Kerberos V provides Kerberos V. It Cyrus IMAPd, OpenLDAP, PHP, and Samba; Kerberos V *IS* provided via GSS. "gssapi.h" is found under /usr/kerberos/include/gssapi/. But I don't know if there is another -direct- API that can be used. I only use

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-02 Thread Tony Earnshaw
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 17:44 skrev Not Zed: > see: > http://www.iana.org/assignments/sasl-mechanisms Thanks! I did, and I'm now that much wiser. I've obviously been reading too much (or misunderstanding) Openldap blurb which couples SASL authentication to Kerberos V. I just use "authentication meth

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-02 Thread Tony Earnshaw
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 22:54 skrev Adam Williams: > GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes? No, Kerberos V provides Kerberos V. > I've asked about this on the > list a couple of times. I've seen other people ask about it. Kerberos > networks are hardly rare, and becoming more common. I'd dispu

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Not Zed
see: http://www.iana.org/assignments/sasl-mechanisms :) On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:15, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed: > > > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: > > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) > > >

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:45, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed: > > > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: > > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) > > > > Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are no

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Tony Earnshaw
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed: > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) > > Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. > why? Because SASL (Simple Authentication and Secur

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Not Zed
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 05:56, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 20:53 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) > > Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are no

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Dan Winship
> GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes? Yes > I've asked about this on the list a couple of times. I've seen other > people ask about it. Yeah, it's not that no one's asked about it, it's that 1. GSSAPI is about 10 times more complicated than Kerberos 4, and 2. We've never had a k

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Adam Williams
>>Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: >>CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) >Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. Others >might say, that they find you have a great product anyway and know what >you mean. They might also s

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Tony Earnshaw
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 20:53 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. Others might say, that they find you have a great produc

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 06:59, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > Hallo people, > > Quiestion from a Unix sysadmin (Exim 4 smtp). > > I have Evo 1.0.8 for a private setup with Exim 4. I use RH rpms and > don't want to compile endless Evo CVS updates - I've better things to > do. > > As Exim mail/sysadmin I'd

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Tony Earnshaw
søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 12:59 skrev Tony Earnshaw: > I have Evo 1.0.8 for a private setup with Exim 4. I use RH rpms and > don't want to compile endless Evo CVS updates - I've better things to > do. P.S.: I don't use rpms for Exim 4.10.8 :c) That's not only impossible, because none exist, but also a

[Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

2002-09-01 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Hallo people, Quiestion from a Unix sysadmin (Exim 4 smtp). I have Evo 1.0.8 for a private setup with Exim 4. I use RH rpms and don't want to compile endless Evo CVS updates - I've better things to do. As Exim mail/sysadmin I'd like Evo to do EHLO, STARTTLS, AUTH (PLAIN, CRAM_MD5, SPA). O.k.,

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH

2001-05-17 Thread Mark Logan
OK, I'll try the next snapshot that I find and let you know if it is working. Until then I'll just keep hitting 'Send Later' and restarting Evolution :) Since we're talking about it, hitting Send Later, after getting the error, crashes or locks up the app about 50% of the time. Thanks, Mark O

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH

2001-05-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
the dialog box says: > Error while 'Sending "Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH"': > RCPT TO response error: Interrupted system call: mail not sent > > > Thanks, > Mark > > > sending : EHLO localhost.localdomain > received: 250-uu-t1-6.visgen.com > r

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH

2001-05-15 Thread Dan Winship
The problem is that it's leaving the SMTP connection open all the time, instead of disconnecting after sending a message. I'm adding that to bugzilla. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolu

Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH

2001-05-15 Thread Mark Logan
Oops, I attached it the first time and typed the address wrong - forgot to attach it the second time. Let's see if I can get it right this time. By the way, the dialog box says: Error while 'Sending "Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH"': RCPT TO response error: Interrupted s

[Evolution] SMTP auth bug?

2001-05-01 Thread Wayne Davis
Hi, I'm having a problem with smtp authentication. When I try to send my first email after starting evolution, I have to logon to the SMTP server. It brings up the box and I type in my proper password. Then it pops up a dialog box that says "Error while 'Sending "test outgoing message"': HELO

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-12 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
So it's looking to me like your SMTP server isn't correctly configured to handle SASL authentication? Error code 500 means that the syntax is invalid, that seems pretty odd to me especially seeing as how Evolution did respond with a syntactically correct response. Does CRAM-MD5 or DIGEST-MD5 wor

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-11 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
You'll need to give me more information to debug this. I've tested the code and it works fine for me. Also, your password is not in either of the strings you removed, but whatever. I'll need at least challenge from the server. Jeff On 10 Apr 2001 17:04:05 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > > There's

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le 2001.04.10 20:19:25 +0200, Dan Winship a écrit : > On 04 Apr 2001 22:46:41 +0930, Not Zed wrote: > > Also just try setting CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 in your environment from > the > > shell you execute evolution-mail in (or rather, do it this way, before > > running evolution) > > There's a new-a

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-10 Thread Not Zed
On 10 Apr 2001 23:19:25 +0500, Dan Winship wrote: > On 04 Apr 2001 22:46:41 +0930, Not Zed wrote: > > Also just try setting CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 in your environment from the > > shell you execute evolution-mail in (or rather, do it this way, before > > running evolution) > > There's a new-and-im

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-10 Thread Wayne F Davis
> There's a new-and-improved easy way to do this, which is to just start > evolution with "evolution --debug /tmp/evolution.out" (or whatever for > the filename). Thanks... here is the communication: sending : EHLO [192.168.0.165] received: 250-heyday.seas.upenn.edu Hello rarya-dsl-gw.dca.net [

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-10 Thread Michael Leone
> On 04 Apr 2001 22:46:41 +0930, Not Zed wrote: > > Also just try setting CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 in your environment from the > > shell you execute evolution-mail in (or rather, do it this way, before > > running evolution) > > There's a new-and-improved easy way to do this, which is to just start

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-10 Thread Dan Winship
On 04 Apr 2001 22:46:41 +0930, Not Zed wrote: > Also just try setting CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 in your environment from the > shell you execute evolution-mail in (or rather, do it this way, before > running evolution) There's a new-and-improved easy way to do this, which is to just start evolution w

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-05 Thread Wayne F Davis
Hi, I'm still experiencing this problem with the latest cvs build and would like to try to help solve it. How can I go about debugging the smtp auth information? Thanks, Wayne On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Wayne F Davis wrote: > I did export it and i ran evolution from a gnome-terminal but I don't see

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-04 Thread Wayne F Davis
I did export it and i ran evolution from a gnome-terminal but I don't see any smtp debugging... just stuff while booting like: Folder registered successfully... etc. What I am doing wrong? Thanks, Wayne > On 04 Apr 2001 16:31:13 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tried that but had

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-04 Thread Not Zed
On 04 Apr 2001 16:31:13 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > Hi, > > I tried that but had a few problems. First, to make sure I had the env > var correct: > [wayne@zero]~$ printenv CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG > 1 > > Then, I tried to run evolution mail via command line. However, it never > actually spawned a

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-04 Thread Wayne F Davis
Hi, I tried that but had a few problems. First, to make sure I had the env var correct: [wayne@zero]~$ printenv CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG 1 Then, I tried to run evolution mail via command line. However, it never actually spawned a window so I just ran evolution. I never saw any information relating

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-04 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
You'll need to run evolution-mail in a terminal by itself after an `export CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1`. Wait ~5 seconds or so after starting evolution-mail before starting evolution in another terminal. Jeff On 04 Apr 2001 01:04:18 -0400, Wayne F Davis wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having a problem connectin

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-04 Thread Not Zed
Also just try setting CAMEL_VERBOSE_DEBUG=1 in your environment from the shell you execute evolution-mail in (or rather, do it this way, before running evolution) On 04 Apr 2001 09:33:01 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Le 2001.04.04 07:04:18 +0200, Wayne F Davis a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'm ha

Re: [Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-04 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le 2001.04.04 07:04:18 +0200, Wayne F Davis a écrit : > Hi, > > I'm having a problem connecting to a server via smtp auth. How can I > debug the communication with the smtp server? > > Thanks. Use ethereal (or another network sniffer) to spy the wire. Or alternatively you could make a sniffin

[Evolution] smtp auth problem - how to debug?

2001-04-03 Thread Wayne F Davis
Hi, I'm having a problem connecting to a server via smtp auth. How can I debug the communication with the smtp server? Thanks. -- Wayne Davis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGP Key Available ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixco