Hi ,
is there any where I can get more information about
this, without actually reading the code itself?
Thanks,
lance
--- Not Zed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able to change stuff that doesn't
involve changing the
corba idl files, or just about any of the camel
object definitions.
You should be able to change stuff that doesn't involve changing the
corba idl files, or just about any of the camel object definitions.
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 16:09, lance lim wrote:
Hi All,
I am a newbie at both Ximian Connector and Evolution
and was wondering how these two components
If you order now, a CD with 1.0 will ship to you on the 14th.
I'll buy 2 once Slackware makes it to the supported distributions ;)
Regards,
--
Ty Norton | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How Ximian is percieved is very important to the open source community.
If they fail then noone will put up capital to help open source
companies get going and if they alienate the community by doing things
in ways the seem deceptive they will fail and we will all lose.
Good point, My first
Just to clarify my feelings on this matter, I am a big supporter of
Ximian and of making money. That's why I am so concerned about Ximian's
image. They are the poster child for open source companies looking to
make a living by both creating software and at the same time supporting
the open source
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote:
The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector
has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out
along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as
though Ximian was afraid they
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 20:25, Brian wrote:
*isn't* it. If people find their making proprietary software
distasteful then they should ante up and buy either their standard or
professional edition of Ximian Gnome (I plan on doing it once 1.0 is on
the CD that I'm buying).
If you order now, a
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 22:08, Nat Friedman wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote:
The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector
has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out
along with all the other plans for evolution. It
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 19:08, Nat Friedman wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote:
The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector
has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out
along with all the other plans for evolution. It
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 19:08, Nat Friedman wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote:
The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector
has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out
along with all the other plans for evolution. It
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 18:14, Dan Winship wrote:
I see that you are talking about only Exchange 2000. Any chance that
there will be back-porting to the Exchange 5.5 platform, for those of us
in a situation where we can't get upgraded to 2000 in a short timeframe?
As mentioned in the
can start to get all bitchy. ;-)
No offense meant by any of what I say.
Best wishes,
- Nils
-Original Message-
From: Chris Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 01:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001
Hello Ximian,
I'll second that, if this is a possibility please get in touch with me and
I'll bug my superiours until they cave.
Best wishes,
Nils
-Original Message-
From: David Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Montag, 3. Dezember 2001 22:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 01:19, Chris Ball wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
This sounds really interesting.
.. furthermore, it sounds like a wonderful business model, given
that nothing else really does this yet. It seems that even Evolution
doesn't,
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 03:04, Jeppe, Nils wrote:
Now if Ximian dumps support/development of Free Evo in favor of Proprietary
Evo, that's when you can start to get all bitchy. ;-)
Just to clarify: We're not making a proprietary Evolution. We're
making a proprietary connector which is separate
I did not assume otherwise.
- Nils
-Original Message-
From: Nat Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2001 15:00
To: Jeppe, Nils
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 03:04, Jeppe, Nils wrote:
Now if Ximian
Me too
I would glady fork over the dough to be a beta tester too, if the option
exists.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 03:06, Jeppe, Nils wrote:
Hello Ximian,
I'll second that, if this is a possibility please get in touch with me and
I'll bug my superiours until they cave.
15:00
To: Jeppe, Nils
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 03:04, Jeppe, Nils wrote:
Now if Ximian dumps support/development of Free Evo in favor of
Proprietary
Evo, that's when you can start to get all bitchy. ;-)
Just to clarify
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 01:02, Ibukun Okitika wrote:
The thing is, in a perfect world, Richard Stallman would be in good
terms with every Tom, Dick and Harry in the corporate world. Of course
that's a ridiculous thought. I was reading the article on The Register
about this, and I thought it
Just to clarify: We're not making a proprietary Evolution. We're
making a proprietary connector which is separate from Evolution and
which uses CORBA to talk to Evolution. Evolution itself is free.
Sounds good, hope the dollars roll in as deserved.
--
Rob Brown-Bayliss
: [Evolution] Ximian Connector?
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
This sounds really interesting.
.. furthermore, it sounds like a wonderful business model, given
that nothing else really does this yet. It seems that even Evolution
doesn't, from the examples
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 19:09, Stephen Witkop wrote:
The only problem that I have with this is the timing. Ximian Connector
has obviously been planned for some time, so why wasn't it laid out
along with all the other plans for evolution. It just makes it seem as
though Ximian was afraid they
Hi. We have enough beta testers for now. I'm not sure what the schedule
of beta testing / early sales / whatever will be as we get closer to the
release date. If you're interested in betaing [if we do end up having
more betas later], or just want to talk about buying, send mail to
[EMAIL
example, our calendaring at the moment is p2p, right? How will Evo(GPL)
handle this when Evo(Proprietary) appears?
(As mentioned by Nat, Evo == GPL, the Connector is a plug-in.)
Is it really planned to
have a version of iCal that wanders around client-client as well as a
version that
On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 18:40, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
I just read about the Ximian Connector for interacting with MS Exchange.
The announcement says the the release date is early next year? Can
someone narrow that down to any calendar month/week?
Nope, but here's a screenshot:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:00:45AM -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
Anyway, as far as Evolution is concerned, the Exchange server is just
another backend that it can read and write iCalendar objects to/from.
The Connector deals with the details of talking to the server and doing
what translation is
On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 17:07, Dan Winship wrote:
On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 18:40, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
I just read about the Ximian Connector for interacting with MS Exchange.
The announcement says the the release date is early next year? Can
someone narrow that down to any calendar
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote:
This sounds really interesting.
.. furthermore, it sounds like a wonderful business model, given
that nothing else really does this yet. It seems that even Evolution
doesn't, from the examples of discussion on here that I've
On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 19:19, Chris Ball wrote:
How will Evo(GPL) handle this when Evo(Proprietary) appears? Is it really
planned to have a version of iCal that wanders around client-client
as well as a version that talks to servers?
I wonder that myself. I hope that Ximian will develop
the answer to Outlook in a Yeah, use Evolution. It's cool. Oh, but
you have to pay for Exchange interoperability. way, and that no-one
mentioned this before. Feels almost like we have to start again, to
find another way of arguing Linux is free. You can do _this_ with it.
to our bosses.
I think it's a perfect idea to give away this great email client but
charge the exchange lusers...er users. I'm sure there will be lots of
choices for backends, some of them free, some of them extremely pricey
(coughOracle 9i/cough). In the end I'm sure charging for exchange
connectivity will
It all sounds a bit, um, icky. And I'm guessing that the development of
the connector isn't going to be at all publically discussed. And I'm a
little frustrated that the mail client that I thought was this huge
effort on the part of the community to write the app that's going to
be a
32 matches
Mail list logo
