On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 08:41 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 21:06 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
What about a CardDAV server? It has server-supplied IDs (the path to the
resource) and a UID as part of the vCard stored there? How is that
handled at the moment?
Hi,
there
,
Andrew McMillan.
--
andrew (AT) morphoss (DOT) com+64(272)DEBIAN
Flexibility is overrated. Constraints are liberating
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 13:58 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
Hello!
Why does the file backend claim that it doesn't support
CAL_STATIC_CAPABILITY_NO_THISANDFUTURE and
CAL_STATIC_CAPABILITY_NO_THISANDPRIOR?
There is code for these in remove_object_instance_cb(),
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 14:08 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:21 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 00:48 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
I've attached the backtrace for a year of 167 (I think) though I don't
think it gives much information. This
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 14:23 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
This really seems like a server-side issue to me. The issue really is
there is no way standard way to specify a hierarchy of tasks in either
UI or in the representation [VTODO] so I think that would be a
special/custom plugin.
I
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 16:20 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 09:16 +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
Does this mean (for example) that we will be able to have a caldav
server, with credentials, and then just associate (and maybe
auto-discover) all of the user's addressbooks
for the timezone
then there is probably usually sufficient information.
It is also unfortunate that there are no canonical timezone identifiers
at present, but for most people the Olson IDs are good enough.
Regards,
Andrew McMillan
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 14:22 -0400, Suman Manjunath wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 11:37 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 2009-09-26 at 15:21 +0200, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
New version of iCalendar was accepted as RFC 5545 (see eg.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545.txt). Does this
