On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 23:04 -0400, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
El Tue, 13-03-2007 a las 13:08 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy escribió:
Hi All,
The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of
* Evolution 2.10.0
* Evolution-Data-Server 1.10.0
I'm
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 00:50 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
Hi,
I know they aren't the most critical patches in the world, but is
there anyway I could convince someone to fix the build logic for iconv
in evolution and evolution-data-server? The patches already exist at
Hi,
This is a list (I hope I have not overlooked any) from the
Evolution/EDS/GtkHTML/Evolution-Exchange modules.
Harish Krishnaswamy
Srinivasa Ragavan
Chenthill Palanisamy
Sankarasivasubramaniam Pasupathilingam
Veerapuram Varadhan
Matthew Barnes
Andre Klapper
Chris Heath
Hiroyuki Ikezoe
Hi Andre,
Thank you for your concern - but I believe I *did* give Matthew some
feedback on the patch over IRC (see Chat transcript [1] below) a couple
of weeks ago - about a possible ABI violation and a possible way to
avoid it and he had agreed to rework that bit.
We do love those who love
Zheng (352108), Nickolay V. Shmyrev (340165),
Matthew Barnes (357970, 383027, 377511), Chris Halls (372528),
Wang Xin (389966, 389961, 380064), Raghavendran (343943),
Kjartan Maraas (330969).
Harish Krishnaswamy (208959 - bnc, 377626)
GtkHTML-3.12.3
--
Updated Translations
Andre : Thanks a lot for sharing these invaluable nuggets. You rock as
always :-).
I have added them to the project wiki at
http://www.go-evolution.org/FAQ. I appeal to all contributors to use
this page for consolidating their FAQ inputs and help in making this
the de facto reference point for
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 00:29 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
hejhej,
Am Dienstag, den 02.01.2007, 14:46 + schrieb Ross Burton:
Those problems might not be a real issue, as nobody really hacks on
libical.
correct,
Although not as active as the rest of the module, there have been quite
a
Hi fellow hackers,
With reference to Bug 380534 on clarifying Evolution's library
requirements, I am putting down my thoughts and recommendations here and
will be proposing this in the weekly evolution meeting (#evolution-meet
on irc.gimp.org at 1000 UTC 6 Dec 2006) tomorrow. Comments/questions
Translations:
Ivar Smolin (et), Jakub Friedl (cs),
Karsten Bräckelmann (nb), Francisco Javier F. Serrador (es),
Christophe Merlet (fr)
Contributors :
Francisco Javier F. Serrador (gnome-doc-tools integration, 358249)
Harish Krishnaswamy (evolution.desktop install fixes, GW proxy pruning,
memory leak
Shreyas,
The code is here
http://svn.opengroupware.org/OGoProjects/evolution/trunk/shreyas/
Some of the files in the packages miss copyright/license details while
many still retain copyright notices from the original Evolution sources
with dated entries and missing information about the
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 21:15 +0100, Håvard Wigtil wrote:
I found
http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfcontent/private.php/evolution/docs/copyright_form.pdf
, and after trying to list that directory the more sensible URL
http://forgeftp.novell.com/evolution/docs/copyright_form.pdf.
Could
Francisco,
Mucho Gracias.
Srinivasa Ragavan / Radhika are currently handling the documentation
tasks of Evolution. I have requested them to work with you and
co-ordinate the efforts towards the adoption of gnome-doc-utils.
Thanks,
Harish
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:52 +0100, Francisco Javier F.
Hi,
Evolution 2.8.1.1 has been released as an update to the Evolution 2.8.1
release (GNOME 2.16 stable series) with fixes to a few critical
bugs/regressions [ see details below].
You can download the source tarballs at
Hi All,
The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of Evolution
2.9.1.
What is New ?
=
This release does not have any new major features yet but includes plenty of
bug fixes since the 2.8.[0 1] releases.
Also, there is no new release on the evolution-exchange module as
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 16:26 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
Stupid question maybe, but configure.in doesn't tell me.
I'm asking because I'd like to use some recently added features like the
GSlice allocator in some patches I'm working o
n. What's the policy on
this? Use whatever GNOME 2.16
:54, Harish Krishnaswamy a écrit :
Patch #1
Bug : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=324118
Description : Remove IMAP4rev1 from stable releases
Approval 1/2.
Approval 2/2
Patch #2
Bug
)
Chenthill (#353763)
Nickolay V. Shmyrev (#334966).
Thanks,
Harish Krishnaswamy.
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Hi Nickolay,
Thanks for the patch. I have reviewed this patch (looks fine) but
following the due process, I prefer to have this reviewed by one of the
mail hackers before the release team is approached and if approved, the
change is absorbed into the release candidate.
This is my current
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 16:12 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
So,
I spent a while digging into this and trying to patch it to remove the
changes and create something that could be back-compat, so we could
downgrade the .so version again.
Then - I noticed that (apparently) SL 10.1
Many of us in the team would be missing the meeting today as it turns
out to be extension of the Indian Independence day and the adjoining
festival.
We would not be meeting at irc today in the regular meeting. If you have
any issues that you wanted to discuss in the meeting, do please post
them
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 21:47 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:54 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Harish,
First - thanks for digging these changes out for me. But - no, I'm not
just interested in ebook (though for OO.o that is all), but I'm
-primarily
version to help avoid regressions, and indeed ship it for
older platforms.
So - if you could do the same for the other e-d-s libraries, it'd be
great to see what changed there too.
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 20:03 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
The changes in question are as follows
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 03:08 -0400, Peter Colijn wrote:
Suppose I am writing a new calendar backend. Which of these two
interfaces is preferred?
The requirements of your application and the characteristics of your
backend should guide the choice.
If I implement ECalBackendSync, will
On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 14:36 -0700, Scott Herscher wrote:
Hey all. I'm trying to add a property to an ESource instance after it
has been created. This change doesn't seem to persist at all. In my
ECalBackend class, I call e_source_set_property(...). Looking at the
code,
Hi Mathew,
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:06 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
Hi all, I've recently started maintaining Evolution for Red Hat.
snip
The source code is dated November 1995 and looks to be isolated to
libical. It's basically a linked-list of void pointers, and I don't see
anything
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 14:36 +0200, Smartuser wrote:
Hi,
I've some question about the camel-private.h
Why is it a no-inst header according to the Makefile.am?
As far as i know almost every provider depends on it.
Is there a reason or is it just a mistake?
Serjan Pruis
As the name
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 17:02 -0400, Teresa Thomas wrote:
How can I obtain the compilation and linking flags necessary for
libical and libecal (EDS)? Pkg-config doesn't seem to be supported.
Thanks.
They are.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ pkg-config --cflags libecal-1.2
-DORBIT2=1 -pthread
On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 19:13 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
At this moment, all those fall under the name of evolution comma data
comma server. Some of these libraries (like Camel) don't necessarily
have anything to do with the Evolution data that is being managed by
the data server of
Hi Philip,
Most Evolution people already know this. This is just the E-mail you
guys have been asking about (well, actually most of you guys asked me to
make a bug in bugzilla).
Yes. The Evolution Team has been in conversation with you by mail/irc
and in person (at GUADEC).
So or
My comments updated on
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337996
-Harish
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 09:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
evolution-exchange-2.7.3 is translation-less
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Tor,
Please commit the patch to HEAD as well as the stable branch. The
change looks fine to me. I will also get the unregister action tested
in the regular builds on the branches and perhaps in MacOS (I do not
know if it matters, but anyway!) as a routine but I do not expect any
surprises.
Yes. It is indeed possible for you to use the IMAP camel provider to
talk to your custom server. Just have a look at how the GroupWise
provider is implemented.
See camel_provider_module_init () in
Yes. I have approved the patch in bugzilla.
Thanks,
Harish
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 10:22 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Hi,
Please look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331743
Evolution 2.7 crashes on startup if you run it within a clean user
account. This happens because
Hi,
P.S. I'm still willing and able to adapt the source for inclusion in the
Evolution source tree, with the developers' consent. However,
introducing choice between the two available junk plugins may render the
user's configuration non-obvious, so I understand if you wish to keep
only one
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 21:35 +0100, Keith Sharp wrote:
Is there a bug open for this? I can pretty reliably recreate this on my
laptop by running Evolution, stopping Evolution cleanly, hibernating my
laptop, resuming and trying to start Evolution.
Keith.
The message means what it says - The
You are right. I am moving the timezone check ahead of init-ing the
calendar server.
Thanks,
Harish
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:25 +0800, Yu-Hui Liu wrote:
Just take a look at evolution/calendar/conduits/todo/todo-conduit.c,
found a bug.
, so I could roll out the tarballs
in time.
The 2.2.6.1 version should work fine for other providers and most
scenarios in GW too, though.
Harish
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 17:54 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Montag, den 24.04.2006, 22:50 +0530 schrieb Harish Krishnaswamy:
You can download
Hi Øystein and Heikki,
My hearty wishes to both of you, the new Debian Evolution package
maintainers :-). Looking forward to work with you towards a better
'Evolution' for the world at large.
On the bigger point, I am in favor of your suggestion on the versioning
scheme for Camel. On finer
Which version of Evolution are you referring to ?
Evolution 2.6 does not let you send mails through accounts that have not
been enabled. This issue has been fixed already.
That also leads me to kindly remind you - Upgrade, Upgrade :-)
Thanks,
Harish
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 02:12 -0300, Jose
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your interest. I am not aware of anyone working on Google
Calendar ATM. You have the head start :). The way to approach this would
be to write a new Calendar backend in Evolution-Data-Server (in C,
yes).
To start,
* Let everybody know you are working on it and
Hi Ralf,
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 17:09 +0200, Ralf Engels wrote:
snip
Bugs at bugzilla.gnome.org don't get re-viewed.
So no checking, no assigning and even my patched bugs just lay around.
Since a month.
Even Microsoft is faster!
I am sorry your patch did not receive more love than it so
Hi all,
The weekly IRC meeting scheduled for 1000 UTC today stands cancelled
as it is a day
off in Bangalore and the team is not in office.
Harish
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 12:11 +, michael meeks wrote:
So,
At the risk of offending the gender-confused; it would be -extremely-
useful to have a Gender boolean in the evolution addresbook [ of course,
perhaps there is I'm just missing it but I dug into the code ].
No. There isn't.
At gentoo, we patched the gtkhtml-2.13.90 tarball. A new one would be
nice, but is not necessary.
fwiw, I rolled out Gtkhtml-2.13.90.1 tarballs yesterday that have
Matthias' fix for the pango issue.
Regards,
Harish
___
Evolution-hackers mailing
hi All,
We are in String/UI Change announcement period and I notice the due
notifications to gnome-doc lists have not been sent for patches related
to the UI Hackfest. So I will be sending a consolidated notification
citing all the changes done as part of the UI Hackfest with a cut-off on
Jan
This change looks fine to me. Actually, it must have been just oversight
not having removed e-util-marshal.list from evolution/widgets/misc.
Srini has been working on widgets/* more than any of us lately, though.
Thoughts, Srini ?
Thanks,
Harish
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 18:47 +0800, simon.zheng
I am away from office - on leave and would be back only on Jan.
Srini/Varadhan, can you please look into the same ?
Thanks,
Harish
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 10:28 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 14:58 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Check out the Recent Changes page... Lots of pages
Andre,
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 14:21 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
so would that patch be accepted? any comments or thoughts on this? and
by whom would it be accepted, because who maintains gnome-spell anymore?
i know that radek was the last person working on gnome-spell (and harish
as
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 00:38 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
It looks like current CVS does not allow sending E-mails uing disabled
accounts.
I very often disable E-mail accounts to make it possible to choose
between multiple of my E-mail addresses.
you mean - not having them shown up in the
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote:
Hi, Harish
I built evolution 2.6 on my Solaris X86 the other day. The build process
was successful, however, as soon as I started evolution-2.6, it crashed.
We investigated this problem and arrived at the following conclusions:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:27 +, Ross Burton wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:19 +, Ross Burton wrote:
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:33 +0800, Irene wrote:
Currently, the MD5Context structures in
evolution-data-server/libedataserver/md5-utils.h and
evolution/e-utils/md5-utils.h are
Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
evolution-data-server/libedataserver.
Yes. To be more precise, evolution-exchange in addition to e-util and
libedataserver :-).
I've created a wiki page
your prefix looks suspicious. Just do a make clean to get rid of the
generated files
and regenerate your Makefile just to be sure..
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:07 -0500, AG wrote:
I believe I've got a simple compile error, but I've not found very many
answers via the ubiquitous google search..
Hi All,
The Evolution Team is pleased to announce the release of Evolution
2.4.0 and Evolution-Data-Server 1.4.0.
What is new since Evolution 2.2 ?
-
- A new menu layout (More HIG compliant)
- Inline PGP Signature/Encryption support.
- Performance enhancements
54 matches
Mail list logo
