On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
This also would do. But normally we would bump it
Matthew,
This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
release. Anyways is fine IMO.
-Srini.
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
The version bump normally happens during the first
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
release. Anyways is fine IMO.
Hi Srini,
I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
release. Anyways is fine IMO.
Hi Srini,
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot
release. Anyways is fine IMO.
Hi Srini,
I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest
The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in
the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for 3.14.
Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to
commit to head also (I think so). For now I can revert till the first
unstable
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in
the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for 3.14.
Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to
commit to head also (I
