Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/24/07 2:07 AM
В Пнд, 24/12/2007 в 13:21 +0800, jacky пишет:
--- Jeff Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
There are two kind of email need to support:
1) An encoded-word was divided into two line. This was
sent by dotProject v2.0.1 .
And there are even
While I was merging camel-lite with camel upstream I noticed this one in
camel-mime-utils.c:
@@ -2110,7 +2105,7 @@
domain = g_string_append_c(domain, '[');
inptr++;
header_decode_lwsp(inptr);
- while
it probably makes more sense to check *inptr first tho I'm not sure if it will
actually make a difference.
Jeff
Philip Van Hoof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/24/07 8:35 AM
While I was merging camel-lite with camel upstream I noticed this one in
camel-mime-utils.c:
@@ -2110,7 +2105,7 @@
Hi there,
I'm doing a shot at trying to port the namespace things that I did for
Tny's Camel-lite to Evolution.
It's not working yet and I have not tested it, there are probably quite
a few things still wrong with the patch too ...
Nonetheless, I'm sending it already to get ideas/opinions from
Hi Jacky,
I've looked over your patch, but unfortunately it is unusable. The patch
is riddled with buffer overflows and incorrect logic.
What types of bugs are you actually trying to fix? What is it about CJK
messages in particular that are not getting decoded properly? Your email
was overly
--- Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
В Пнд, 24/12/2007 в 13:21 +0800, jacky
пишет:
--- Jeff Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
There are two kind of email need to support:
1) An encoded-word was divided into two line. This
was
sent by dotProject v2.0.1 .
And there are even more
