[Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread ritz
Hello

  I am currently trying to build ZimbraEvoltuion from
http://zimbra.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbra/trunk/ZimbraEvolution/ .

 Unfortunately, i am hitting a few bugs

1. Zimbra is hardcoded against Evolution 2.6/2.8, and not 2.12 
( hacked around )
2. Zimbra has issues when using intltool m4 macro on Fedora8.
( hacked around )

3. The one where i am stuck

e-shell.h is included by es-event.h, but not available with
evolution-devel on Fedora8.i386

$ grep e-shell /usr/include/evolution-2.12/shell/es-event.h
#include e-shell.h

$ rpm -qf /usr/include/evolution-2.12/shell/es-event.h
evolution-devel-2.12.1-3.fc8

$ rpm -ql evolution-devel|grep e-shell
/usr/include/evolution-2.12/shell/e-shell-utils.h


From what i am able to see, e-shell.h is a part of gnome 2.20
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution/branches/gnome-2-20/shell/


$ yum -y update evolution\*
Setting up Update Process
Could not find update match for evolution*
No Packages marked for Update


-- 
Ritesh Khadgaray
ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ
Desktop LinuX N Stuff
Ph: +919970164885
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.
Fedora is the best of what works today.  Enterprise Linux is the best of
what will work consistently for the next seven years.

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 01:21 +0530, ritz wrote:
 e-shell.h is included by es-event.h, but not available with
 evolution-devel on Fedora8.i386

Try applying the patch here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499920

I'm in the process of adding it to the Rawhide package now.  I can also
add it to Fedora 8 if there's sufficient demand.

Matthew Barnes

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 01:21 +0530, ritz wrote:
   I am currently trying to build ZimbraEvoltuion from
 http://zimbra.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbra/trunk/ZimbraEvolution/ .

Oh also, I learned that [1] is a more up-to-date repo.

[1] https://zimbraevo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbraevo

Matthew Barnes

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] Fedora/ ZimbraEvolution: e-shell.h called by es-event.h, but not available with evolution-devel on

2007-11-29 Thread ritz
Hello


On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 15:32 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 01:21 +0530, ritz wrote:
I am currently trying to build ZimbraEvoltuion from
  http://zimbra.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbra/trunk/ZimbraEvolution/ .
 
 Oh also, I learned that [1] is a more up-to-date repo.
 
 [1] https://zimbraevo.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/zimbraevo
Thanks, this seems  to be for Evo 2.10. Will hack this up for Evo2.12 .


 
 Matthew Barnes
 
-- 
Ritesh Khadgaray
ॐ मणि पद्मे हूँ
Desktop LinuX N Stuff
Ph: +919970164885
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway.
Fedora is the best of what works today.  Enterprise Linux is the best of
what will work consistently for the next seven years.

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


[Evolution-hackers] Is there a reason copy does't preserve mark for followup?

2007-11-29 Thread Ross Boylan
Using evolution 2.10 (but with 1.12 backend) on Debian I notice that
when I copy a folder the flagged as important is preserved but the
mark for followup is not.  I'm guessing most other marks are not
preserved either (though replied is preserved).  The code seems to
show a few state variables are all coded into one binary variable; I'm
guessing these are preserved.  They also seem to be stored on the IMAP
server.

My copies were all on or between IMAP servers, using the IMAP server
type.

Is preserving the other elements of message state (e.g., mark for
followup) simply a missing feature, or is there some reason this doesn't
happen?  In particular, is it missing because it's hard to do?

I'm moving significant amounts of mail between servers; unfortunately, I
didn't notice some of the info was being lost until it was too late.

I'm also poking around to see about saving additional state on the IMAP
server; some folks gave me some pointers earlier.

Thanks.
-- 
Ross Boylan  wk:  (415) 514-8146
185 Berry St #5700   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics   fax: (415) 514-8150
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, CA 94107-1739 hm:  (415) 550-1062

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] HTML composer as a standalone program?

2007-11-29 Thread Zan Lynx

On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 13:22 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
[cut]
 Evolution merely wraps GtkHTML's Bonobo-based HTML editor with
 additional buttons and menus that make it suitable as an email composer.
 There's a simple standalone test program in GtkHTML under
 components/html-editor/test_editor that may serve as a starting point
 for your needs.

I believe Evolution uses its very own fork of GtkHTML, as I discover
each time I try to file a bug against GtkHTML and get told its an
Evolution-only bug.

Someone needs to go and fix Evo so it properly converts amp; to 
inside HREF attributes again.  It's been broken this whole release.  I
hate having to save the email to disk and reopen it from Firefox in
order to properly use the links in some emails.
-- 
Zan Lynx [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] HTML composer as a standalone program?

2007-11-29 Thread Sankar P

On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 17:35 -0700, Zan Lynx wrote:
 On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 13:22 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote:
 [cut]
  Evolution merely wraps GtkHTML's Bonobo-based HTML editor with
  additional buttons and menus that make it suitable as an email composer.
  There's a simple standalone test program in GtkHTML under
  components/html-editor/test_editor that may serve as a starting point
  for your needs.
 
 I believe Evolution uses its very own fork of GtkHTML, as I discover
 each time I try to file a bug against GtkHTML and get told its an
 Evolution-only bug.


Only if you copy and paste, you will have this problem. Just click on
the link. It will open correctly.

 
 Someone needs to go and fix Evo so it properly converts amp; to 
 inside HREF attributes again.  It's been broken this whole release.  I
 hate having to save the email to disk and reopen it from Firefox in
 order to properly use the links in some emails.
 ___
 Evolution-hackers mailing list
 Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
 http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
-- 
Sankar P
Harver's Law: A drunken man's words are a sober man's thoughts

 Novell, Inc. 
Software for the Open Enterprise™
http://www.novell.com
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers