[Please don't top-post and please remove unneeded full quotes. Thanks!]
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 16:22 +0100, Anna Marei wrote:
> Hi Milan, i am not familiar with the way how GNOME develop it's apps.
> I thought that hackers seem to be the one who do the programming
> stuff and take care of the code.
Hi Milan, i am not familiar with the way how GNOME develop it's apps. I thought
that hackers seem to be the one who do the programming stuff and take care of
the code. And users are user who report bugs or propose new Evolution features.
So could you please explain why sending it to the evolutio
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 08:12 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > - Send later
>
> Send @ [time] would be somewhat useful. Sounds complicate to
> implement though.
Hi,
there is something in-between. In Edit->Preferences->Composer
Preferences one can set Evolution to send messages through
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 11:33 +0100, Anna Marei wrote:
> Wouldn't this be great?
> Maybe in a way Nylas https://www.nylas.com/nylas-mail/ now
> Mailspring https://getmailspring.com/ does?
> E.g.
> - Single, unified inbox
Honestly, I fail to see the point of that at all. And - Evolution has
that fe
On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 11:33 +0100, Anna Marei wrote:
> I guess (e-mail) communication has changed over the last decades.
> So why not overhaul Evoultions way of dealing with it?
Your fork and complete rewrite is welcome.
Just do it. :)
andre
--
Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net
http://blogs.gnome
Wouldn't this be great?
Maybe in a way Nylas https://www.nylas.com/nylas-mail/
https://www.nylas.com/nylas-mail/ now Mailspring https://getmailspring.com/
does?
E.g.
- Single, unified inbox
- Snooze messages
- Send later
or the possibility to realize something within Evolution like
http:
