Cyrus has a facility to maintain indices on the server.
Will such indices help evolution? I know it tends to build its own
indices, and so suspect the server side indices are irrelevant (I think
it takes an IMAP SEARCH command to access them).
I'm on evo 2.22 on Debian Lenny.
Thanks.
Ross
state on the IMAP
server; some folks gave me some pointers earlier.
Thanks.
--
Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146
185 Berry St #5700 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics fax: (415) 514-8150
University
I believe that some of the flags associated with messages (e.g.,
follow-up) are stored by the evolution client, rather than kept on the
server. For at least some IMAP servers it should be possible to define
custom flags on the server and use them.
This would be very useful to me, since I'm
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:29 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 09:18 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
I believe that some of the flags associated with messages (e.g.,
follow-up) are stored by the evolution client, rather than kept on the
server. For at least some IMAP servers
I'm preserving the exchange for context; my responses are sprinkled
below.
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 23:47 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-10 at 15:55 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Second question: even if it creates
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 09:46 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Speaking of complexity, evolution/camel (and maybe Gnome?) do a kind
of
objects with C. Why not just use C++? Was the C++ toolchain too
unreliable at the start, or was there some other reason?
I didn't mean to exclude other alternatives
API.
--
Ross Boylan wk: (415) 514-8146
185 Berry St #5700 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept of Epidemiology and Biostatistics fax: (415) 514-8150
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, CA 94107-1739
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
[Ross wrote]
Second question: even if it creates a folder, does it need to stick
around for the folder creation to finish? I think I remember seeing
that camel was single-threaded
not true...
, relying on the client app to
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
it's not possible to do better w/o dropping features like message
threading.
In fact, the above minimalizing
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:27 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 15:13 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 17:11 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:23 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
.
All good points. I should explain I'm thinking of a mode
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 20:22 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Why does it need to create a CamelFolder for the destination at all,
assuming I keep the focus on the source folder?
because you need both a source and a destination folder to move the
message(s) to?
kinda hard to move messages
On Thursday 31 May 2007 16:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 17:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
[snip]
Single namespace. It's all INBOX.folder.subfolder.
The one wrinkle is that in some cases 'folder' exists in the namespace,
but is not an actual box or folder
to handle the mail store I described?
How do I find out which of the imap store's code I'm actually using?
Thanks.
Ross Boylan
___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I
have
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I
have
an IMAP
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
[Ross] What version to start with?
I would prefer, if you can try it with Evolution 2.10.2. It is the
most recent stable release.
Is EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_1_10_2 the corresponding tag to use for
evolution-data-server?
--
Ross
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has
evo
2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did
17 matches
Mail list logo
