Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:07 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot release. Anyways is fine IMO. Hi Srini, I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and the latest ChangeLog entry is: 2007-09-03 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release * NEWS, configure.in: But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is: 2007-09-17 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release * NEWS: * configure.in: So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed. Which, BTW, is still the case for evolution (version 2.11.92 in svn) and e-d-s (version 1.11.92 in svn). The changes up to and including x.12.0 must still be on someones disk. It is there in gnome-2-20 branch as well. It isn't there in trunk. So the gnome-2-20 branch is further along than trunk? -- jules ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
Matthew, This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot release. Anyways is fine IMO. -Srini. On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for 3.14. Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to commit to head also (I think so). For now I can revert till the first unstable release/version bump happens. I'm confused. This is what needs to change in GtkHtml's configure.in: -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE, 3.15.92) +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE, 3.16.0) to satisfy this already-committed change to Evolution's configure.in: -m4_define([libgtkhtml_minimum_version], [3.14.0]) +m4_define([libgtkhtml_minimum_version], [3.16.0]) The bump in requirements is due to GtkHtml's new printing API. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot release. Anyways is fine IMO. Hi Srini, I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and the latest ChangeLog entry is: 2007-09-03 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release * NEWS, configure.in: But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is: 2007-09-17 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release * NEWS: * configure.in: So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed. Which, BTW, is still the case for evolution (version 2.11.92 in svn) and e-d-s (version 1.11.92 in svn). The changes up to and including x.12.0 must still be on someones disk. Please commit. Thanks, jules ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 14:34 +0200, Jules Colding wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot release. Anyways is fine IMO. Hi Srini, I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and the latest ChangeLog entry is: 2007-09-03 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release * NEWS, configure.in: But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is: 2007-09-17 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release * NEWS: * configure.in: So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed. Which, BTW, is still the case for evolution (version 2.11.92 in svn) and e-d-s (version 1.11.92 in svn). The changes up to and including x.12.0 must still be on someones disk. It is there in gnome-2-20 branch as well. It isn't there in trunk. -Srini. Please commit. Thanks, jules ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 08:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 12:11 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: This also would do. But normally we would bump it during the next dot release. Anyways is fine IMO. Hi Srini, I think we still have a misunderstanding here. The latest revision of Subversion trunk still has the version in configure.in at 3.15.92 and the latest ChangeLog entry is: 2007-09-03 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.15.92 release * NEWS, configure.in: But the latest ChangeLog entry in the 3.16.0 tarball is: 2007-09-17 Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** GtkHTML 3.16.0 release * NEWS: * configure.in: So it looks like at least the ChangeLog, NEWS, and configure.in changes prior to the 3.16.0 tarball upload were never committed. Yeah not to trunk. Got it. It was done just to gnome-2-20 branch only. Hopefully this clears things up. I can commit the differences between the released tarball and Subversion trunk if you'd like. Feel free to do that. -Srini. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for 3.14. Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to commit to head also (I think so). For now I can revert till the first unstable release/version bump happens. -Srini. On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 10:58 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: Will gtkhtml be bumped soon? Is there a 'usual' way around this? ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evo svn head requires libgtkhtml-3.14 = 3.16.0' but gtkhtml svn head is Version: 3.15.92
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 23:03 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: The version bump normally happens during the first unstable release in the trunk. I'm wondering how is it that it is requesting for 3.14. Ah, I remember, I approved a patch for gnome-2-20 branch and asked to commit to head also (I think so). For now I can revert till the first unstable release/version bump happens. I'm confused. This is what needs to change in GtkHtml's configure.in: -AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE, 3.15.92) +AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE($PACKAGE, 3.16.0) to satisfy this already-committed change to Evolution's configure.in: -m4_define([libgtkhtml_minimum_version], [3.14.0]) +m4_define([libgtkhtml_minimum_version], [3.16.0]) The bump in requirements is due to GtkHtml's new printing API. Matthew Barnes ___ Evolution-hackers mailing list Evolution-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
