Re: [Evolution-hackers] State of the Bonobo removal effort for Evolution

2008-11-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 13:35 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > Thanks for the great update on this Matt. Its going to be a tough time > for many of us for the next couple of months. That's one reason, I asked > you to look at Camel/Gobject stuff for 2.27.x. May be, we have too many > things to do, w

Re: [Evolution-hackers] State of the Bonobo removal effort for Evolution

2008-11-17 Thread Martin Owens
> > Thanks for the great update on this Matt. Its going to be a tough time > for many of us for the next couple of months. That's one reason, I asked > you to look at Camel/Gobject stuff for 2.27.x. May be, we have too many > things to do, which would take more than a 6-month cycle? May be a > bi

Re: [Evolution-hackers] State of the Bonobo removal effort for Evolution

2008-11-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 01:36 -0500, Matthew Barnes wrote: > Hi folks, > > One of the goals for Evolution 2.26 is to finally remove the use of > Bonobo and BonoboUI from Evolution [1] in favor of equivalent > functionality now provided by the GTK+ stack. This is happening in > parallel with Ross Bu

[Evolution-hackers] State of the Bonobo removal effort for Evolution

2008-11-16 Thread Matthew Barnes
Hi folks, One of the goals for Evolution 2.26 is to finally remove the use of Bonobo and BonoboUI from Evolution [1] in favor of equivalent functionality now provided by the GTK+ stack. This is happening in parallel with Ross Burton's effort to port Evolution-Data-Server from using Bonobo to D-Bu