Frederic Crozat wrote:
I think the a11y issue came from the original addition of a11y in
evolution which was done after the initial code was done and it was
decided to keep it in a separate place to prevent people stepping on
others toes.
Maybe it is time to change them to static links.
Li
_
Le lundi 16 juin 2008 à 17:51 +0300, Tor Lillqvist a écrit :
> > you'd get a nice dependency loop in Makefile.
>
> Welcome to the club. The circular dependencies between shared
> libraries in e-d-s and evolution are "interesting". As you might
> imagine some dirty hacks, er, I mean clever tricks[1
> you'd get a nice dependency loop in Makefile.
Welcome to the club. The circular dependencies between shared
libraries in e-d-s and evolution are "interesting". As you might
imagine some dirty hacks, er, I mean clever tricks[1], are needed to
work around the circular dependencies when building th
Hi guys,
we (Mandriva) are currently trying to do some cleanups in a lot of
packages regarding overlinking and underlinking for dynamic libraries
(see http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Underlinking and
http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Overlinking for more explanations).
Unfortunately, Evolution can't be bui
