Re: [Evolution-hackers] Understanding (and maybe cleaning) a11y library split in evolution

2008-06-17 Thread Li Yuan
Frederic Crozat wrote: I think the a11y issue came from the original addition of a11y in evolution which was done after the initial code was done and it was decided to keep it in a separate place to prevent people stepping on others toes. Maybe it is time to change them to static links. Li

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Understanding (and maybe cleaning) a11y library split in evolution

2008-06-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
you'd get a nice dependency loop in Makefile. Welcome to the club. The circular dependencies between shared libraries in e-d-s and evolution are interesting. As you might imagine some dirty hacks, er, I mean clever tricks[1], are needed to work around the circular dependencies when building this