I wanted to clarify the documentation for camel_store_free_folder_info()
a bit. In found myself altering its implementation. Rationale is
(obviously) to simply make sure that camel_store_free_folder_info()
handles a NULL return of camel_store_get_folder_info() gracefully so my
documentation change
On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 12:37 +0530, Chenthill wrote:
> Thanks, I will send out a mail to the list mentioning the critical
> fixes which have gone in recently in the stable branch which needs to be
> taken into the distro's.
Bug #548268 is in trunk (thanks Chenthill!) and tested automatically
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 18:19 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
[snip]
> void
> camel_store_free_folder_info (CamelStore *store, CamelFolderInfo *fi)
> {
> + if (!fi)
> + return;
> +
that null-check should probably go after the g_return below:
> g_return_if_fail (CAMEL_IS_STORE (sto
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 16:46 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 18:19 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
Viewing this message's subject actually renders a tab between "[...] of"
and "code." This tab was inserted (I suppose by evolution) because the
Subject header wrapped some magic line l
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 23:01 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 16:46 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 18:19 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> (I suppose by evolution) [...].
>
> Evolution shouldn't do that.
No. I should have looked longer. Seems to be a bug in the l
