Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-06-10 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:57 +0200, Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi, > the WebKit based composer was commited into master with [0]. Awesome! Congrats on landing that - that's a pretty major feature and I'll start testing it immediately. Also I have to say I'm thrilled to finally see GtkHTML die for goo

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-06-09 Thread Daniel Vrátil
On Monday 09 of June 2014 16:57:48 Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi, > the WebKit based composer was commited into master with [0]. Congratulations for taming the WebKit beast, Tomas! Cheers, Dan > > Tomas > > [0] - > https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=8650fb139a9143f04615de74f > f569bc

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-06-09 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi, the WebKit based composer was commited into master with [0]. Tomas [0] - https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=8650fb139a9143f04615de74ff569bce3e0c4ce3 On Po, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi Evolution hackers, > as some of you probably know, I'm continuing

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-30 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 08:28 +0200, Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi everyone, > after talk with Milan we decided to merge webkit-composer branch into > master on Monday, June 9, 2014. Woo Hooo! I guess it is time to remember how to build Evo. > On Po, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > > W

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-30 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On May 30, 2014 9:28 AM, "Tomas Popela" wrote: > > Hi everyone, > after talk with Milan we decided to merge webkit-composer branch into > master on Monday, June 9, 2014. Great news! Thanks guys for all the work you've been doing! I'll compile it first thing on Monday :) __

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-29 Thread Tomas Popela
Hi everyone, after talk with Milan we decided to merge webkit-composer branch into master on Monday, June 9, 2014. Best regards Tomas On Po, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi Evolution hackers, > as some of you probably know, I'm continuing with work on new Evolution > composer

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-20 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Milan Crha wrote: > On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 16:34 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > > ping... > > Hi, > do not be afraid, it is not forgotten, there was only involved some > other work which interrupted the webkit-composer work. It's mostly over > now and the ex

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-20 Thread Milan Crha
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 16:34 +0400, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > ping... Hi, do not be afraid, it is not forgotten, there was only involved some other work which interrupted the webkit-composer work. It's mostly over now and the expected development version with the webkit composer branch merged

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-05-20 Thread Emre Erenoglu
ping... On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Emre Erenoglu wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > >> The next release following 3.12 will happen in March, 2015. So we have >> an entire year to stabilize the WebKit composer. Also the HTML library >> that the composer is

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-30 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:21 AM, Matthew Barnes wrote: > The next release following 3.12 will happen in March, 2015. So we have > an entire year to stabilize the WebKit composer. Also the HTML library > that the composer is currently based on has been dead several years now, > and I personally

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 20:05 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > While I have no say in how Evolution gets developed, I nonetheless would > like to warn against merging unstable and known buggy code into master. > What if it turns out that the code can't be stabilized in time for the > next release? Can it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Patrick Ohly
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > Regarding the future of WebKit based Evolution composer I'm proposing > this: merge webkit-composer branch into master when the 3.12 release > will be branched and continue to work on it in master branch. This will > hopefully bring more test

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 09:25 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > Regarding the future of WebKit based Evolution composer I'm proposing > this: merge webkit-composer branch into master when the 3.12 release > will be branched and continue to work on it in master branch. This will > hopefully bring more test

Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit based Evolution composer status and future

2014-03-17 Thread Emre Erenoglu
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi Evolution hackers, > as some of you probably know, I'm continuing with work on new Evolution > composer based on WebKit (WebKit1) and I want to share with you the > current status and the future of new composer. > Hi Tomas, first of all